allow negative freq strings #8651
Conversation
|
Just so I understand, this is not backwards-incompatible because we did not allow negative frequency strings earlier? |
Yes that's correct. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks great @mathause—thanks!
I think the tests you updated look pretty solid. In my testing it seems like it just works, but maybe one more you could add would be an explicit test that calling (Edit this is tested in the infer_freq on a decreasing CFTimeIndex returns a negative frequency?test_date_range_like test).
Co-authored-by: Spencer Clark <spencerkclark@gmail.com>
xarray/tests/test_cftime_offsets.py
Outdated
| result = date_range(start, end, freq=freq, calendar="standard", use_cftime=True) | ||
| expected = date_range(start, end, freq=freq, use_cftime=False) | ||
|
|
||
| # end of month/ year is not convertable to datetimeindex | ||
| assert result.size == expected.size |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we can check for equality now, similar to the test above:
| result = date_range(start, end, freq=freq, calendar="standard", use_cftime=True) | |
| expected = date_range(start, end, freq=freq, use_cftime=False) | |
| # end of month/ year is not convertable to datetimeindex | |
| assert result.size == expected.size | |
| result = date_range(start, end, freq=freq, calendar="standard", use_cftime=True) | |
| result = result.to_datetimeindex() | |
| expected = date_range(start, end, freq=freq, use_cftime=False) | |
| np.testing.assert_array_equal(result, expected) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ultimately I suppose this test could now be merged with the one above—i.e. just merge the frequency strings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
of course - thanks
* allow negative freq strings * update docstring * fix date_range_like * whats-new entry * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Spencer Clark <spencerkclark@gmail.com> * only test standard calendar * merge tests --------- Co-authored-by: Spencer Clark <spencerkclark@gmail.com>
whats-new.rstThis allows negative freq strings as discussed in #8627 (comment) Deciding which tests to update was not easy.
The pandas
_generate_rangefunction was moved to https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/3c96b8ff6d399fbec8d4d533e8e8618c592bb64b/pandas/core/arrays/datetimes.py#L2725 They no longerrollbacktheend. I had to remove this as well such that the following are eqivalent:I am slightly nervous about this but all the tests still pass...
Once again cc @spencerkclark