Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Type Hints] nn.GraphSizeNorm #5729

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Oct 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

nihal-rao
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5729 (b9cec36) into master (2febad4) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head b9cec36 differs from pull request most recent head e050371. Consider uploading reports for the commit e050371 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5729   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.02%   84.02%           
=======================================
  Files         349      349           
  Lines       19288    19292    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        16206    16210    +4     
  Misses       3082     3082           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch_geometric/nn/norm/graph_size_norm.py 93.33% <100.00%> (+2.42%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

torch_geometric/nn/norm/graph_size_norm.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/nn/norm/test_graph_size_norm.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rusty1s rusty1s enabled auto-merge (squash) October 16, 2022 09:02
@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit 0e6076f into pyg-team:master Oct 16, 2022
JakubPietrakIntel pushed a commit to JakubPietrakIntel/pytorch_geometric that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2022
Co-authored-by: Matthias Fey <matthias.fey@tu-dortmund.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants