Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Code Coverage] transforms/largest_connected_components.py #6670

Merged

Conversation

akash-vartak
Copy link
Member

Improving code coverage for transforms/largest_connected_components.py for the following code path(s):

  • Initializing LargestConnectedComponents with a connection type

@akash-vartak akash-vartak marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2023 23:27
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6670 (65ab912) into master (d2eb1f2) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 65ab912 differs from pull request most recent head b2eadea. Consider uploading reports for the commit b2eadea to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6670   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.54%   88.55%           
=======================================
  Files         423      423           
  Lines       23114    23114           
=======================================
+ Hits        20467    20468    +1     
+ Misses       2647     2646    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ometric/transforms/largest_connected_components.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+4.34%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@rusty1s rusty1s enabled auto-merge (squash) February 12, 2023 09:31
@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit 12052bb into pyg-team:master Feb 12, 2023
@akash-vartak akash-vartak deleted the test_largest_connected_components-dev branch February 13, 2023 18:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants