-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: prepared geometry as additional (cached) attribute on GeometryObject #92
Merged
caspervdw
merged 19 commits into
pygeos:master
from
jorisvandenbossche:prepared-experiment
Nov 11, 2020
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fac66af
POC: prepared geom as additional (cached) attribute on Geometry
jorisvandenbossche 6b5f7cb
no return argument for the prepare ufunc
jorisvandenbossche a0823eb
clean-up the prepare function
jorisvandenbossche 2bd8ba4
intersects predicate that checks for prepared geoms
jorisvandenbossche 63ac856
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into prepared-experiment
caspervdw e4562cc
Implement prepare and destroy_prepared
caspervdw 0f58d74
Towards generalizing to other predicates
caspervdw 95ba8b2
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into prepared-experiment
caspervdw d820971
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into prepared-experiment
caspervdw 974ec1b
PR Changes
caspervdw 46d1507
Docs + revert deleted test
caspervdw 6c12b71
The other prepared predicates
caspervdw bbba481
Update docstrings
caspervdw 85bfa00
Merge branch 'master' into prepared-experiment
caspervdw 84ace7d
Apply suggestions from code review
caspervdw e52ec5a
Docstrings
caspervdw 4195099
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into prepared-experiment
caspervdw 38c2108
Merge branch 'master' into prepared-experiment
caspervdw 23bc103
Changelog
caspervdw File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I copy pasted some lines of code here to get it working, but in principle we don't need to return anything here (the geoms get modified in place). But I need to check if ufuncs can have zero return values.
(this is the part that can still give segfault after a while, as I suppose the return value here is not properly set up for GC)