Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix graphviz_wrap.c for Pypy3 #183

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

khoroshilov
Copy link

027d11d ("Fix graphviz_wrap.c _wrap_agwrite for Pypy3") covers _wrap_agwrite,
but leaves the same problem in _wrap_agread because it fixes code in
the file generated by swig.

The commit introduces additional disturbance due using newer swig version:
3.0.8 instead of 3.0.7.

Fixes #177.

027d11d ("Fix graphviz_wrap.c _wrap_agwrite for Pypy3") covers _wrap_agwrite,
but leaves the same problem in _wrap_agread because it fixes code in
the file generated by swig.

The commit introduces additional disturbance due using newer swig version:
3.0.8 instead of 3.0.7.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.972% when pulling a8b445b on khoroshilov:master into 6d7a15b on pygraphviz:master.

4 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.972% when pulling a8b445b on khoroshilov:master into 6d7a15b on pygraphviz:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.972% when pulling a8b445b on khoroshilov:master into 6d7a15b on pygraphviz:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.972% when pulling a8b445b on khoroshilov:master into 6d7a15b on pygraphviz:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.972% when pulling a8b445b on khoroshilov:master into 6d7a15b on pygraphviz:master.

@jarrodmillman jarrodmillman added this to the 1.6 milestone Jul 8, 2020
@jarrodmillman jarrodmillman marked this pull request as draft July 17, 2020 23:39
@dschult dschult marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2020 05:02
@dschult
Copy link
Contributor

dschult commented Aug 2, 2020

I believe this change is no longer needed after #230 was merged. no check for version before 3.0 is needed.

@dschult dschult closed this Aug 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Segfault when reading a GraphViz file with pypy3
4 participants