Add license #2
Add license #2
Conversation
Legorooj
added
help wanted
LICENSE
Outdated
|
|
||
| This software is made available under the terms of the licenses | ||
| found in LICENSE.APL.txt or LICENSE.GPL.txt Contributions to the community hooks are made | ||
| under the terms of the license that covers that type of hook. (See below) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would reword this along these lines:
- Project is licensed under GPL-2.0-or later. (so this is the primary license)
Thus this would cover also files which are not hooks ;-) - As an exception for this, run-time hooks are licensed under Apache-2.0.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For free Software, this file typically is called COPYING. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For free Software, this file typically is called
COPYING. WDYT?
It doesn't matter really. I prefer LICENSE; To me that says "These are the license terms with which you can use this code". But let me know if you'd like it changed.
I've reworded the file locally; I'll push the changes in a minute or two.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the main repo we call it "COPYING.txt", so haveing the same name here would be consistent. But as yu said, it actually dies not matter.
I have no strong preference, you decide.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re frst bullet-point: I'd put the GPL first, since this is the default :-)
No description provided.