-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hooks: add hook for langdetect and swagger_spec_validator #302
Conversation
This is rather odd. The actions for both the master repo and my fork are behaving normally so it appears to be specific to your fork but your master branch is even with ours so I don't see what the difference could be. In eric15342335/pyinstaller-hooks-contrib/settings/actions, do you have Allow all actions selected? That's what we have. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need news entries for each one. Use the issue numbers instead of the PR numbers in the news entries' filenames.
I'd prefer that each news entry was added in the same commit as the hook and test rather than an extra add news item commit but it's not that important. I've triggered CI from my own fork for now. https://github.com/bwoodsend/pyinstaller-hooks-contrib/actions/runs/1162353622 |
@eric15342335 I'd like to add you to the PyInstaller team and give you basic triaging permissions. Basically you'd be able to do what I do here - make sure new pull requests make sense and have tests and news entries. Then I'll eventually give you push access so that you can start merging yourself too. You'll also be able to do the same on the main PyInstaller repo too. Sound OK? |
Sounds pretty good, thank you! |
OK, let me work out who has permission to grant other people permissions... |
In theory, you should have received an invite. Could you also send me an email so that I can send you a link to the Discord channel we use to talk to each other. |
#285 and #296
I seems can not run the workflow