Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add validate backend fucntion #341

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2024
Merged

Add validate backend fucntion #341

merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented May 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved backend validation with the introduction of the validate_backend function, enhancing flexibility and clarity.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the create_executor function to utilize the new validate_backend function for backend validation.
  • Tests

    • Adjusted test cases to accommodate the new validate_backend function and its additional parameters.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the backend validation mechanism in the pympipool package. The check_backend function has been replaced with validate_backend, which now includes additional parameters to better handle different backend scenarios. This update affects the create_executor function and associated test files, ensuring more explicit and robust backend validation.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pympipool/scheduler/__init__.py Replaced check_backend with validate_backend and updated create_executor function accordingly.
pympipool/shared/inputcheck.py Renamed check_backend to validate_backend and updated its signature to include new parameters.
tests/test_shared_input_check.py Updated tests to use validate_backend with additional parameters.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Scheduler
    participant InputCheck

    User->>Scheduler: create_executor(backend, flux_installed, slurm_installed)
    Scheduler->>InputCheck: validate_backend(backend, flux_installed, slurm_installed)
    InputCheck-->>Scheduler: Validated backend
    Scheduler-->>User: Executor created
Loading

Poem

In the code where changes bloom,
Validate the backend's room.
Flux or Slurm, choose with care,
New checks ensure it's fair.
Tests aligned, functions neat,
CodeRabbit’s job is now complete. 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62fae9c and 5c05f5f.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • pympipool/scheduler/init.py (3 hunks)
  • pympipool/shared/inputcheck.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_shared_input_check.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
tests/test_shared_input_check.py (2)

13-13: Import of validate_backend is correct and aligns with the changes in the function's name and usage.


40-42: The test case update for validate_backend correctly reflects the changes in the function's signature and parameters.

pympipool/shared/inputcheck.py (1)

70-85: The implementation of validate_backend correctly handles the new parameters flux_installed and slurm_installed. The function now supports more explicit backend validation based on the installation status of Flux and SLURM.

pympipool/scheduler/__init__.py (2)

16-16: Import of validate_backend and validate_number_of_cores is correct and necessary for the updated create_executor function.


90-92: The update in create_executor to use validate_backend with the new parameters flux_installed and slurm_installed is correctly implemented. This change ensures that the backend is validated more robustly based on the system's configuration.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 75613c1 into main May 29, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the validate_backend branch May 29, 2024 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant