Remove dependency on `pkg_resources` from `setuptools` #1536

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-01T14:27:44Z

Steps

For new features or bug fixes, add a ChangeLog entry describing what your PR does.
Write a good description on what the PR does.

Description

Remove dependence on pkg_resources from setuptools, which is discouraged, and which increases import time.

Type of Changes

	Type
✓	🔨 Refactoring

Related Issue

Closes #1103
Closes #1320

[unscientific benchmark]: 50% reduction of import time on an M1 mac, 67% reduction on a cloud console

DanielNoord · 2022-05-01T14:32:12Z

Haven't looked at the code, but please see #1326 and it's reversal in #1409.

I don't have the exact reasons on the top of my head, but we should be careful here as this already regressed once.

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-01T16:41:54Z

the exact reasons

Thanks for the heads up! Looks like it was because parent packages were actually being imported. I believe I worked around that (I see one fewer failure in the pylint test suite that leads me to that belief).

There is still this one failure in pylint, though:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TestRunTC.test_regression_recursive_current_dir _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

self = <test_self.TestRunTC object at 0x10fa44b20>

def test_regression_recursive_current_dir(self):
    with _test_sys_path():
        # pytest is including directory HERE/regrtest_data to sys.path which causes
        # astroid to believe that directory is a package.
        sys.path = [
            path
            for path in sys.path
            if not os.path.basename(path) == "regrtest_data"
        ]
        with _test_cwd():
            os.chdir(join(HERE, "regrtest_data", "directory"))

          self._test_output(

                ["."],
                expected_output="No such file or directory",
            )

tests/test_self.py:1270:

self = <test_self.TestRunTC object at 0x10fa44b20>, args = ['--rcfile=/Users/jacobwalls/pylint/pylint/testutils/testing_pylintrc', '.'], expected_output = 'No such file or directory'

def _test_output(self, args: list[str], expected_output: str) -> None:
    out = StringIO()
    args = _add_rcfile_default_pylintrc(args)
    self._run_pylint(args, out=out)
    actual_output = self._clean_paths(out.getvalue())
    expected_output = self._clean_paths(expected_output)

  assert expected_output.strip() in actual_output.strip()

E AssertionError: assert 'No such file or directory' in ''
E + where 'No such file or directory' = <built-in method strip of str object at 0x10f9d0800>()
E + where <built-in method strip of str object at 0x10f9d0800> = 'No such file or directory'.strip
E + and '' = <built-in method strip of str object at 0x10ca30030>()
E + where <built-in method strip of str object at 0x10ca30030> = ''.strip

tests/test_self.py:169: AssertionError

coveralls · 2022-05-03T22:52:23Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2331561683

27 of 27 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
3 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.06%) to 91.864%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
astroid/inference_tip.py	1	97.22%
astroid/interpreter/_import/spec.py	2	98.25%

Totals
Change from base Build 2321941977:	0.06%
Covered Lines:	9213
Relevant Lines:	10029

💛 - Coveralls

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-03T23:55:39Z

No more failures in pylint. I'd be more comfortable merging after dropping python3.6, but apparently this isn't blocked any more.

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py

DanielNoord · 2022-05-04T06:08:35Z

tests/unittest_manager.py

@@ -128,7 +126,6 @@ def test_implicit_namespace_package(self) -> None:
    def test_namespace_package_pth_support(self) -> None:


Do these tests still fail without certain code? I thought these lines were needed to make these packages namespace packages in a hacky way.

Yeah, if you just make is_namespace() unconditionally return False, these tests fail. My understanding is that the hacks were just for the reliance on the private variables of pkg_resources. (Part of the reason pkg_resources is discouraged now, I take it!)

I haven't gotten around to testing it, but are we sure this still catches namespace packages defined in the pkg_resources way? I know I had made a test package when I initially worked on this and was then able to keep the same tests. See: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#pkg-resources-style-namespace-packages

TestPackage.zip

The above zip contains a package as defined by that guideline. With the following diff:

diff --git a/astroid/interpreter/_import/spec.py b/astroid/interpreter/_import/spec.py index 7a1de6cdb..cc963d722 100644 --- a/astroid/interpreter/_import/spec.py +++ b/astroid/interpreter/_import/spec.py @@ -328,6 +328,9 @@ def _find_spec_with_path(search_path, modname, module_parts, processed, submodul spec = finder.find_module(modname, module_parts, processed, submodule_path) if spec is None: continue + if spec.type == ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: + print(spec) + print(finder) return finder, spec raise ImportError(f"No module named {'.'.join(module_parts)}")

And the following command: pylint ../namespace_package/myotherpackage

main returns:

ModuleSpec(name='myotherpackage', type=<ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: 10>, location=None, origin=None, submodule_search_locations=['/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/myotherpackage']) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.PathSpecFinder object at 0x1062e12d0> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: 10>, location='', origin='namespace', submodule_search_locations=['/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace']) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ExplicitNamespacePackageFinder object at 0x1062e17b0> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: 10>, location='', origin='namespace', submodule_search_locations=['/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace']) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ExplicitNamespacePackageFinder object at 0x1062e18d0> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: 10>, location='', origin='namespace', submodule_search_locations=['/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace']) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ExplicitNamespacePackageFinder object at 0x1062e1000>

Whereas this PR returns:

ModuleSpec(name='myotherpackage', type=<ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: 10>, location=None, origin=None, submodule_search_locations=['/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/myotherpackage']) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.PathSpecFinder object at 0x1053054b0>

Without the if:

ModuleSpec(name='myotherpackage', type=<ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: 10>, location=None, origin=None, submodule_search_locations=['/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/myotherpackage']) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.PathSpecFinder object at 0x10df415a0> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df41570> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df412a0> ModuleSpec(name='subpackage_a', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace/subpackage_a', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df40340> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df41c60> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df41e40> ModuleSpec(name='subpackage_a', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace/subpackage_a', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df40340> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df417b0> ModuleSpec(name='subpackage_a', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace/subpackage_a', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df41e40> ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='/Users/daniel/DocumentenLaptop/Programming/Github/namespace_package/mynamespace', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) <astroid.interpreter._import.spec.ImportlibFinder object at 0x10df41e70>

mynamespace is thus interpreted as a different type of package. I don't know if this is actually a bug or if we are actually fixing a bug here, but I would need to do some more investigation before signing off on this. Perhaps you already know why this is different and whether this is a good thing from your own investigations?

Thanks for looking into this. I see the same output on main vs. the PR. Would you mind checking one more time? I also tried varying my cwd and invoking pylint differently.

I see PKG_DIRECTORY: 3 for mynamespace and PY_NAMESPACE: 10 for myotherpackage on both:

% python3 -m pylint mynamespace --disable=all ModuleSpec(name='mynamespace', type=<ModuleType.PKG_DIRECTORY: 3>, location='./mynamespace', origin=None, submodule_search_locations=None) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Your code has been rated at 10.00/10 (previous run: 0.00/10, +10.00) % python3 -m pylint myotherpackage --disable=all ModuleSpec(name='myotherpackage', type=<ModuleType.PY_NAMESPACE: 10>, location=None, origin=None, submodule_search_locations=['/Users/myuser/TestPackage/./myotherpackage']) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Your code has been rated at 10.00/10 (previous run: 0.00/10, +10.00)

Ah, you did say cd /tmp/TestPackage. Weird.

Is misread your question and thought you asked for my config. Well, there you have it 😄

I believe cd into the folder is required for this "test" to work.

OH. This is the part I wasn't expecting:

python -m pip install -e .

So the test case has to do with installing the package under site-packages. I wasn't expecting that.

Yeah, I guess that is required for importlib to figure out that mynamespace is indeed a namespace package (although I don't know the specifics).

I think it's possible it's the other way around. Installing it under site-packages with pip is enough to get astroid's ImportlibFinder to find it first rather than ExplicitNamespacePackageFinder. And in that case, if installed with pip, it is a regular package, not a namespace package. So we might have fixed something here if this wasn't happening before.

Oh hm, that might actually be true. I just assumed changed behaviour was a regression.

I am not completely sure though. So I'll need to play around with this a little bit more to be sure. Should find time for this this week!

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-04T12:57:40Z

As I can't hit the now uncovered lines on my CPython install even on main, I'm assuming the coverage reduction is due to PyPy objects being built more like CPython now?

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-14T19:49:30Z

@DanielNoord I played around with the old-style setuptools packages here:
https://github.com/PyCQA/astroid/blob/826f6efc14bb63531fafe67da26802e6e77005b4/tests/testdata/python3/data/path_pkg_resources_1/package/__init__.py#L1

I did manage to find a behavior difference with main, so I'll push changes in a second, but it doesn't seem to be the behavior change you observed. If this package already in the test suite is not correct somehow, let's try to identify how. 🤔

This is what I observed:

>>> import astroid
>>> import tests.testdata.python3.data.path_pkg_resources_1.package.foo
>>> astroid.interpreter._import.util.is_namespace('tests.testdata.python3.data.path_pkg_resources_1')  # was False with my original PR, True on main
True

DanielNoord · 2022-05-14T19:53:08Z

@DanielNoord I played around with the old-style setuptools packages here:

https://github.com/PyCQA/astroid/blob/826f6efc14bb63531fafe67da26802e6e77005b4/tests/testdata/python3/data/path_pkg_resources_1/package/__init__.py#L1

I did manage to find a behavior difference with main, so I'll push changes in a second, but it doesn't seem to be the behavior change you observed. If this package already in the test suite is not correct somehow, let's try to identify how. 🤔

This is what I observed:
>>> import astroid
>>> import tests.testdata.python3.data.path_pkg_resources_1.package.foo
>>> astroid.interpreter._import.util.is_namespace('tests.testdata.python3.data.path_pkg_resources_1')  # was False with my original PR, True on main
True

This was the original test case that my attempt bonked on as well. I'm excited to see what you came up with!

tests/unittest_manager.py

DanielNoord

Some last nitpicks. I have tested and played around with this some more and I think this might indeed fix all the issues.

Let's go ahead and get this in! 🎉

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py

tests/unittest_manager.py

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-15T21:52:02Z

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py

+    if found_spec.submodule_search_locations is not None:
+        for search_location in found_spec.submodule_search_locations:
+            if any(
+                _is_setuptools_namespace(directory)
+                for directory in pathlib.Path(search_location).iterdir()
+                if directory.is_dir()
+            ):
+                return True


Aaaand with better distinguishing between builtins and namespace packages, we ... don't even need this anymore? Highlighting in a comment in case we pop the hood on this again.

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py

DanielNoord

🎉

DanielNoord · 2022-05-29T06:25:50Z

@jacobtylerwalls I'm seeing a crash in one of my pylint primer runs. I haven't investigated, but this was my first guess. See:
https://github.com/DanielNoord/pylint/runs/6641534527?check_suite_focus=true
Seems to happen when lining django? Do you have any idea?

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-29T12:34:00Z

Yep, this PR caused it. I'll take a look.

DanielNoord · 2022-05-29T12:34:50Z

@jacobtylerwalls Thanks!

jacobtylerwalls · 2022-05-29T16:58:17Z

@DanielNoord See #1575, I'm waiting on a response to the CPython issue linked there.

Follow up to pylint-dev#1536

Remove dependence on pkg_resources from setuptools

22bca18

jacobtylerwalls added topic-performance Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining astroid or the dev workflow labels May 1, 2022

jacobtylerwalls added this to the 2.12.0 milestone May 1, 2022

Pierre-Sassoulas added the High effort 🏋 Difficult solution or problem to solve label May 1, 2022

Ensure parent packages are not imported

f53159e

jacobtylerwalls added 2 commits May 1, 2022 12:46

consistent return

0c536f1

Pretend we've already dropped python3.6 and what is the result?

52eb095

jacobtylerwalls added Blocked 🚧 A PR or issue blocked by another PR or issue pylint-tested PRs that don't cause major regressions with pylint labels May 3, 2022

jacobtylerwalls marked this pull request as ready for review May 3, 2022 23:55

jacobtylerwalls removed the Blocked 🚧 A PR or issue blocked by another PR or issue label May 3, 2022

jacobtylerwalls mentioned this pull request May 4, 2022

Require Python 3.7.2 #1542

Merged

DanielNoord reviewed May 4, 2022

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into pkg_resources

3175f0d

jacobtylerwalls added Blocked 🚧 A PR or issue blocked by another PR or issue and removed Blocked 🚧 A PR or issue blocked by another PR or issue labels May 7, 2022

Handle old setuptools namespace package protocol

c8e2764

jacobtylerwalls commented May 14, 2022

View reviewed changes

tests/unittest_manager.py Show resolved Hide resolved

jacobtylerwalls added 3 commits May 14, 2022 16:03

add import back

46a5d29

Merge branch 'main' into pkg_resources

cbb47d9

fix crash

4394f6d

jacobtylerwalls removed the pylint-tested PRs that don't cause major regressions with pylint label May 14, 2022

DanielNoord requested changes May 15, 2022

View reviewed changes

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

tests/unittest_manager.py Show resolved Hide resolved

tests/unittest_manager.py Show resolved Hide resolved

jacobtylerwalls added 2 commits May 15, 2022 16:55

better order of conditions

c46e443

cast to Path

6d088ab

DanielNoord approved these changes May 15, 2022

View reviewed changes

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

more concise implementation

7aa7da4

DanielNoord reviewed May 15, 2022

View reviewed changes

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

jacobtylerwalls added 2 commits May 15, 2022 17:24

None, not "namespace"

fa60940

Distinguish builtins from namespace packages

d0b90f4

jacobtylerwalls commented May 15, 2022

View reviewed changes

Remove unnecessary search

f30e100

jacobtylerwalls requested a review from DanielNoord May 15, 2022 22:00

jacobtylerwalls commented May 15, 2022

View reviewed changes

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

astroid/interpreter/_import/util.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

jacobtylerwalls added 2 commits May 15, 2022 19:40

Easier check for builtins

3dbe761

Reduce size of diff

d92c48e

DanielNoord approved these changes May 16, 2022

View reviewed changes

Remove unused __future__

01b00a2

jacobtylerwalls changed the title ~~Remove dependence on pkg_resources from setuptools~~ Remove dependency on pkg_resources from setuptools May 16, 2022

jacobtylerwalls merged commit 5067f08 into pylint-dev:main May 23, 2022

jacobtylerwalls deleted the pkg_resources branch May 23, 2022 02:07

jacobtylerwalls mentioned this pull request May 29, 2022

Provide first component of dotted path to namespace searches #1575

Merged

2 tasks

jacobtylerwalls mentioned this pull request May 31, 2022

Special case __main__ in is_namespace() #1579

Merged

jacobtylerwalls added a commit to jacobtylerwalls/astroid that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022

More conservative interpretation of PathFinder failures

3e42b07

Follow up to pylint-dev#1536

jacobtylerwalls added a commit to jacobtylerwalls/astroid that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022

More conservative interpretation of PathFinder failures

900056f

Follow up to pylint-dev#1536

jacobtylerwalls mentioned this pull request May 31, 2022

More conservative interpretation of PathFinder.find_spec() failures #1581

Merged

2 tasks

jacobtylerwalls mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2022

pylint fails to import module if the script is named the same way pylint-dev/pylint#7093

Open

michael-k mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2022

Failure with pylint-2.15.0: pylint_plugin_utils.NoSuchChecker: <class 'pylint.checkers.typecheck.TypeChecker'> pylint-dev/pylint-plugin-utils#27

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Remove dependency on `pkg_resources` from `setuptools` #1536

Remove dependency on `pkg_resources` from `setuptools` #1536

jacobtylerwalls commented May 1, 2022 •

edited

DanielNoord commented May 1, 2022

jacobtylerwalls commented May 1, 2022 •

edited

coveralls commented May 3, 2022 •

edited

jacobtylerwalls commented May 3, 2022

DanielNoord May 4, 2022

jacobtylerwalls May 4, 2022

DanielNoord May 4, 2022

DanielNoord May 4, 2022

jacobtylerwalls May 14, 2022

DanielNoord May 14, 2022

jacobtylerwalls May 14, 2022

DanielNoord May 14, 2022

jacobtylerwalls May 14, 2022

DanielNoord May 14, 2022

jacobtylerwalls commented May 4, 2022

jacobtylerwalls commented May 14, 2022 •

edited

DanielNoord commented May 14, 2022

DanielNoord left a comment

jacobtylerwalls May 15, 2022 •

edited

DanielNoord left a comment

DanielNoord commented May 29, 2022 •

edited

jacobtylerwalls commented May 29, 2022

DanielNoord commented May 29, 2022

jacobtylerwalls commented May 29, 2022

		@@ -128,7 +126,6 @@ def test_implicit_namespace_package(self) -> None:
		def test_namespace_package_pth_support(self) -> None:

Remove dependency on pkg_resources from setuptools #1536

Remove dependency on pkg_resources from setuptools #1536

Conversation

jacobtylerwalls commented May 1, 2022 • edited

Steps

Description

Type of Changes

Related Issue

DanielNoord commented May 1, 2022

jacobtylerwalls commented May 1, 2022 • edited

coveralls commented May 3, 2022 • edited

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2331561683

💛 - Coveralls

jacobtylerwalls commented May 3, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jacobtylerwalls commented May 4, 2022

jacobtylerwalls commented May 14, 2022 • edited

DanielNoord commented May 14, 2022

DanielNoord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jacobtylerwalls May 15, 2022 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

DanielNoord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

DanielNoord commented May 29, 2022 • edited

jacobtylerwalls commented May 29, 2022

DanielNoord commented May 29, 2022

jacobtylerwalls commented May 29, 2022

Remove dependency on `pkg_resources` from `setuptools` #1536

Remove dependency on `pkg_resources` from `setuptools` #1536

jacobtylerwalls commented May 1, 2022 •

edited

jacobtylerwalls commented May 1, 2022 •

edited

coveralls commented May 3, 2022 •

edited

jacobtylerwalls commented May 14, 2022 •

edited

jacobtylerwalls May 15, 2022 •

edited

DanielNoord commented May 29, 2022 •

edited