Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add setup.py back to fix dependabot #7082

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2022
Merged

Add setup.py back to fix dependabot #7082

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2022

Conversation

cdce8p
Copy link
Member

@cdce8p cdce8p commented Jun 28, 2022

Description

Followup to #7076 (comment)
Turns out setup.py is required for dependabot. At least for now.

/CC: @DanielNoord

@cdce8p cdce8p added the Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow label Jun 28, 2022
@cdce8p cdce8p added this to the 2.15.0 milestone Jun 28, 2022
@cdce8p cdce8p mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2022
Merged
@cdce8p cdce8p merged commit 7109eb5 into pylint-dev:main Jun 28, 2022
@cdce8p cdce8p deleted the fix-dependabot branch June 28, 2022 21:54
@cdce8p
Copy link
Member Author

cdce8p commented Jun 28, 2022

Everything works again as expected.

Screen Shot 2022-06-28 at 23 58 05

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2579359676

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 95.325%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2579303425: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 16658
Relevant Lines: 17475
💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@DanielNoord DanielNoord DanielNoord approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.15.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@cdce8p @coveralls @DanielNoord