[RTM if tests pass] inverse OCP

[EveCharbie]

All Submissions:

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document [docs/contribution.md]?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open [Pull Requests] for the same update/change?
• Have you opened/linked the issue related to your pull request?
• Have you used the tag [WIP] for on-going changes, and removed it when the pull request was ready?
• When ready to merge, have you sent a comment pinging @pariterre in it?

New Feature Submissions:

1. Does your submission pass the tests (if not please explain why this is intended)?
2. Did you write a proper documentation (docstrings and ReadMe)
3. Have you linted your code locally prior to submission (using the command: black . -l120 --exclude "external/*")?

Changes to Core Features:

• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
• Have you written new examples for your core changes, as applicable?
• Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?

---

This change is 

[EveCharbie]

@pariterre I will not create a full test because it would be too long.
But, do I create smaller tests to make sure that this example evolves with the rest of bioptim? If yes, is ti an inconvenience if we now have to install pygmo?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 79.55% and project coverage change: -0.35 ⚠️

Comparison is base (936813d) 81.91% compared to head (9d90027) 81.56%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #635      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.91%   81.56%   -0.35%     
==========================================
  Files         109      110       +1     
  Lines       12140    12341     +201     
==========================================
+ Hits         9944    10066     +122     
- Misses       2196     2275      +79     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...xamples/getting_started/example_external_forces.py	88.23% <ø> (ø)
...imal_control/double_pendulum_torque_driven_IOCP.py	37.06% <37.06%> (ø)
bioptim/limits/phase_transition.py	92.22% <50.00%> (ø)
.../torque_driven_ocp/pendulum_with_passive_torque.py	65.71% <60.00%> (ø)
...es/torque_driven_ocp/example_multi_biorbd_model.py	72.72% <72.72%> (ø)
...amples/torque_driven_ocp/ocp_mass_with_ligament.py	75.75% <75.75%> (ø)
bioptim/limits/constraints.py	83.21% <80.00%> (ø)
bioptim/misc/mapping.py	90.67% <89.74%> (+1.10%)	⬆️
bioptim/interfaces/biorbd_model.py	96.01% <95.58%> (ø)
bioptim/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[EveCharbie]

@pariterre, we might need to change the dependencies in conda-forge?

[pariterre]

Reviewed 1 of 4 files at r1, 4 of 5 files at r2, 2 of 2 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @EveCharbie)

---

README.md line 114 at r3 (raw file):

- [Moving estimation horizon](#moving-estimation-horizon)
- [Acados](#acados)
- [Inverse_optimal_control](#inverse_optimal_control)

Normal casing? make sure this links work

Code quote:

Inverse_optimal_control

---

tests/test_all_examples.py line 499 at r3 (raw file):

def test__inverse_optimal_control__doublep_endulum_torque_driven_IOCP():

Suggestion:

double_pendulum

[EveCharbie]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @pariterre)

---

README.md line 114 at r3 (raw file):

Previously, pariterre (Pariterre) wrote…

Normal casing? make sure this links work

Done.

---

tests/test_all_examples.py line 499 at r3 (raw file):

def test__inverse_optimal_control__doublep_endulum_torque_driven_IOCP():

Done.

[pariterre]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @EveCharbie)

---

README.md line 114 at r3 (raw file):

Previously, EveCharbie (Eve Charbonneau) wrote…

Done.

I don't see the difference

[EveCharbie]

Reviewable status: 5 of 8 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @pariterre)

---

README.md line 114 at r3 (raw file):

Previously, pariterre (Pariterre) wrote…

I don't see the difference

Just wait 1sec, I am committing XD

[pariterre]

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r4, 1 of 1 files at r5, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @EveCharbie)