New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add discussion of package formats, expanding "Wheel vs Egg" discussion #1397
Conversation
CI had a spurious failure:
Can it be retried? |
924ebef
to
cffb4b0
Compare
I have updated this PR with latest main and made some minor fixes. Review would be appreciated. |
cffb4b0
to
5af20bf
Compare
Fixed the merge conflict. Review would still be appreciated 馃檪 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Some comments/nitpicks, but they should not block getting this merged
Thank you! |
This a discussion that I would have found useful not long ago. I seem not to be alone.
After merging this, a redirect should be added in RTD from https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/discussions/wheel-vs-egg/ to https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/discussions/package-formats/ .
馃摎 Documentation preview 馃摎: https://python-packaging-user-guide--1397.org.readthedocs.build/en/1397/