Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

A nicer user experience when hosts are blocked #71

Closed
ghost opened this issue Aug 25, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

A nicer user experience when hosts are blocked #71

ghost opened this issue Aug 25, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement major

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 25, 2013

Originally reported by: jaraco (Bitbucket: jaraco, GitHub: jaraco)

In Distribute #333, @aclark4life reported a frustration held by some regarding the error message when hosts are blocked due to the --allow-hosts option to easy_install. Let's address that issue.
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 26, 2013

Original comment by jaraco (Bitbucket: jaraco, GitHub: jaraco):

Updated error message reported when --allow-hosts blocks a link to provide a less startling user experience. Fixes #71.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Mar 29, 2016
jaraco added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2021
@jaraco
Merge pull request #71 from abravalheri/use-tokenize
85db7a4 
Update `distutils.core.setup/run_setup` to better match `setuptools.build_meta`.
jaraco added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2023
@jaraco
Updated error message reported when --allow-hosts blocks a link to …
4041d1f 
…provide a less startling user experience. Fixes #71.
jaraco added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2023
@jaraco
Make substitution fields more prominent and distinct from true 'skele…
96ebfe1 
…ton' references. (#71)

Fixes #70
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement major
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
0 participants