Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restore local distutils as the default. #2896

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jaraco
Copy link
Member

@jaraco jaraco commented Nov 19, 2021

With the closure of https://github.com/pypa/distutils/milestone/1, Setuptools now should be able to re-enable its local distutils as the default.

Before releasing this change, I'd like for platform reps to test the behavior of Setuptools>=59.2 with SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=local to ensure that the workarounds (reliance on sysconfig schemes, _distutils_system_mod) added in distutils are adequate.

I'll give these platforms 30 days (Dec 18) to evaluate the behavior and identify any blockers.

/cc: @hugovk, @mattip, @FFY00

Please feel free to unsubscribe or tag in others.

@jaraco jaraco marked this pull request as draft November 19, 2021 02:33
@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor

hroncok commented Nov 19, 2021

I have not seen the status of https://github.com/pypa/distutils/milestone/1 so I will basically just report the status of Fedora:

  • Fedora 33 will go EOL this month, so I'll ignore it completely.
  • On Fedora 36+ with Python 3.10+, we no longer patch distutils at all. We only patch sysconfig and I assume switching to local distutils should be safe.
  • On Pythons 3.11+, the situation is the same on all Fedora versions.
  • In Python 3.10 in Fedora 35 and Python 3.9 in Fedora 34 (the "main" Python interpreter in given Fedora releases) we still patch distutils. It is nearly impossible to change this in those already released Fedoras. Fedora 34 goes EOL in ~half a year, Fedora 35 goes EOL in ~1 year.
  • In all Fedoras, all older versions of Pythons still patch distutils. We can adapt Python 3.9 to 3.6 on Fedora 36 to match the 3.10+ behavior (it will be arduous but should be possible).

As a side note, we will most likely not be able to change RHEL/EPEL at all. That is a dead-end and I assume we are on our own there. If the setuptools version that switches to local distutils also drops Python 3.6 support, we would be happy.

We could:

  1. do the switch in 1 year
  2. do the switch conditionally on Python version (as does pip wrt distutils/sysconfig paths)
  3. add a hack similar to Integrate Debian patches distutils#4 but instead of guessing the distro, read some stdlib attribute.

I assume that you are not willing to do (1) or (2), so I can definitively look at (3).

Our legacy distutils patch is fedora-python/cpython@42d0bdb#diff-ad882d2747b67da1f6b5a8d3a08f0865ee7bb9fd88c4e8e3ff946d338606e818

Would you take that, guarded by something like if getattr(sysconfig, "_distutils_mangle_rpm_prefix", False)?

hroncok added a commit to hroncok/distutils that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2021
@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor

hroncok commented Nov 19, 2021

See pypa/distutils#70

@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Nov 20, 2021

On Fedora 36+ with Python 3.10+, we no longer patch distutils at all. We only patch sysconfig and I assume switching to local distutils should be safe.

One important distinction is that distutils still relies on the headers key of the scheme, which doesn't exist in sysconfig. If the values present in distutils are inadequate for Fedora or Fedora customizes include in sysconfig, I'd double-check that the sysconfig patches include that key.

If the setuptools version that switches to local distutils also drops Python 3.6 support, we would be happy.

That's do-able.

In Python 3.10 in Fedora 35 and Python 3.9 in Fedora 34 (the "main" Python interpreter in given Fedora releases) we still patch distutils. It is nearly impossible to change this in those already released Fedoras. Fedora 34 goes EOL in ~half a year, Fedora 35 goes EOL in ~1 year.

Have you considered in these older environments to recommend/force setting SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=stdlib?

@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor

hroncok commented Nov 20, 2021

Have you considered in these older environments to recommend/force setting SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=stdlib?

I wonder how. Setting that environment variable when Python starts?

Also, I assume eventually, this would stop being a possibility, right?

@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Nov 20, 2021

Have you considered in these older environments to recommend/force setting SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=stdlib?

I wonder how. Setting that environment variable when Python starts?

I don't have any particular opinion. It would need to happen before .pth files are processed. What would happen if it were set system-wide? I guess that would be bad for environments that wish to adopt Setuptools with its default behavior in other Pythons or environments.

Also, I assume eventually, this would stop being a possibility, right?

Eventually, probably around Python 3.9 EOL, but of course we'll strive to provide a smooth transition.

@0-wiz-0
Copy link

0-wiz-0 commented Nov 21, 2021

Hi! Sorry for the perhaps naive question, but what is the best way for me to test this?
Could you please provide a package like you would push to pypi? That seems the easiest way for me to make sure I'll test what will be used later on.

@imba-tjd
Copy link
Contributor

@0-wiz-0 you could use pip install https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/archive/refs/heads/feature/local-distutils.zip

@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Nov 22, 2021

@0-wiz-0 you could use pip install https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/archive/refs/heads/feature/local-distutils.zip

Or, since all this change does is make local distutils the default, you can simply set SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=local and run with that.

But most important is to use setuptools >= 59.2 as that's the one that's needed to honor platform-specific hooks.

hroncok added a commit to hroncok/setuptools that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2021
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Dec 5, 2021

Also need to incorporate mingw/cygwin distutil patches - see pypa/distutils#60 (comment), pypa/distutils#60 (comment);
#2909 adds a CI for Cygwin

@rgommers
Copy link

Just checking: does this go into 60.0 and not into 59.x?

@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Dec 10, 2021

As currently written, the .change will trigger a 0.1 bump. But I agree this should be a .breaking.

@Bo98
Copy link

Bo98 commented Dec 13, 2021

From Homebrew's side we completely override the prefix (base var). This is because under our system, the Python install directory and the install directory that should be used for user-installed packages should be separate (or user packages are lost on upgrades).

We currently do this via distutils.cfg planted in the standard library distutils which will of course not work anymore.

Going forward we're looking at the system that will hopefully be introduced in Python 3.11 to add additional install schemes to sysconfig.py:

Notably, the idea is schemes should be added rather than replaced. This is why sysconfig.get_preferred_scheme(key) was introduced in Python 3.10. This is also important when dynamic logic may be required. Ideally I reckon distutils should use this when selecting a scheme.

While the above will cover Python 3.10+, there'll still be a question about what we do for <= 3.9. sysconfig._prefix_addition is almost what we want, though I don't know if calculating a relative path and going up levels (..) is a good idea.

@jaraco jaraco marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2021 00:24
@jaraco jaraco merged commit f7a55da into main Dec 20, 2021
@jaraco jaraco deleted the feature/local-distutils branch December 20, 2021 00:24
scoder added a commit to cython/cython that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2021
cdce8p added a commit to cdce8p/astroid that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2021
With v60.0.0 setuptools started monkeypatching the distuils module
to use their own vendored version. Longterm any uses of distuils
should be replaced or removed.

pypa/setuptools#2896
ndevenish added a commit to ndevenish/dxtbx that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
The change in pypa/setuptools#2896 seems
to have broken all our builds.
ndevenish added a commit to cctbx/dxtbx that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
The change in pypa/setuptools#2896 seems
to have broken all our dxtbx github builds.
@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor

hroncok commented Jan 21, 2022

So, it seems that while this is solved wrt our /local/ addition, we have neglected the fact that on Python 3.8 or lesser, we also patch distutils to use lib64: fedora-python/cpython@31397a8

That means, users who run setuptools 60+ on Fedora with Python 3.7 or 3.8 might experience weirdness, as described in for example in pylint-dev/pylint#5704

@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor

hroncok commented Jan 21, 2022

I've opened pypa/distutils#110

bonzini pushed a commit to qemu/qemu that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2022
Setuptools v60 and later include a bundled version of distutils, a
deprecated standard library scheduled for removal in future versions of
Python. Setuptools v60 is only possible to install for Python 3.7 and later.

Python has a distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() function that returns
'/usr/lib/pythonX.Y' on posix systems. RPM-based systems actually use
'/usr/lib64/pythonX.Y' instead, so Fedora patches stdlib distutils for
Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 to return the correct value.

Python 3.9 and later introduce a sys.platlibdir property, which returns
the correct value on RPM-based systems.

The change to a distutils package not provided by Fedora on Python 3.7
and 3.8 causes a regression in distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() that
ultimately causes false positives to be emitted by pylint, because it
can no longer find the system source libraries.

Many Python tools are fairly aggressive about updating setuptools
packages, and so even though this package is a fair bit newer than
Python 3.7/3.8, it's not entirely unreasonable for a given user to have
such a modern package with a fairly old Python interpreter.

Updates to Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 are being produced for Fedora which
will fix the problem on up-to-date systems. Until then, we can force the
loading of platform-provided distutils when running the pylint
test. This is the least-invasive yet most comprehensive fix.

References:
 pypa/setuptools#2896
 pylint-dev/pylint#5704
 pypa/distutils#110

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220204221804.2047468-2-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
liweiwei90 pushed a commit to plctlab/plct-qemu that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2022
Setuptools v60 and later include a bundled version of distutils, a
deprecated standard library scheduled for removal in future versions of
Python. Setuptools v60 is only possible to install for Python 3.7 and later.

Python has a distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() function that returns
'/usr/lib/pythonX.Y' on posix systems. RPM-based systems actually use
'/usr/lib64/pythonX.Y' instead, so Fedora patches stdlib distutils for
Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 to return the correct value.

Python 3.9 and later introduce a sys.platlibdir property, which returns
the correct value on RPM-based systems.

The change to a distutils package not provided by Fedora on Python 3.7
and 3.8 causes a regression in distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() that
ultimately causes false positives to be emitted by pylint, because it
can no longer find the system source libraries.

Many Python tools are fairly aggressive about updating setuptools
packages, and so even though this package is a fair bit newer than
Python 3.7/3.8, it's not entirely unreasonable for a given user to have
such a modern package with a fairly old Python interpreter.

Updates to Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 are being produced for Fedora which
will fix the problem on up-to-date systems. Until then, we can force the
loading of platform-provided distutils when running the pylint
test. This is the least-invasive yet most comprehensive fix.

References:
 pypa/setuptools#2896
 pylint-dev/pylint#5704
 pypa/distutils#110

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220204221804.2047468-2-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
newfriday pushed a commit to newfriday/qemu that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2022
Setuptools v60 and later include a bundled version of distutils, a
deprecated standard library scheduled for removal in future versions of
Python. Setuptools v60 is only possible to install for Python 3.7 and later.

Python has a distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() function that returns
'/usr/lib/pythonX.Y' on posix systems. RPM-based systems actually use
'/usr/lib64/pythonX.Y' instead, so Fedora patches stdlib distutils for
Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 to return the correct value.

Python 3.9 and later introduce a sys.platlibdir property, which returns
the correct value on RPM-based systems.

The change to a distutils package not provided by Fedora on Python 3.7
and 3.8 causes a regression in distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() that
ultimately causes false positives to be emitted by pylint, because it
can no longer find the system source libraries.

Many Python tools are fairly aggressive about updating setuptools
packages, and so even though this package is a fair bit newer than
Python 3.7/3.8, it's not entirely unreasonable for a given user to have
such a modern package with a fairly old Python interpreter.

Updates to Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 are being produced for Fedora which
will fix the problem on up-to-date systems. Until then, we can force the
loading of platform-provided distutils when running the pylint
test. This is the least-invasive yet most comprehensive fix.

References:
 pypa/setuptools#2896
 pylint-dev/pylint#5704
 pypa/distutils#110

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220204221804.2047468-2-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
vlsunil pushed a commit to ventana-micro-systems/RISC-V-qemu that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Setuptools v60 and later include a bundled version of distutils, a
deprecated standard library scheduled for removal in future versions of
Python. Setuptools v60 is only possible to install for Python 3.7 and later.

Python has a distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() function that returns
'/usr/lib/pythonX.Y' on posix systems. RPM-based systems actually use
'/usr/lib64/pythonX.Y' instead, so Fedora patches stdlib distutils for
Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 to return the correct value.

Python 3.9 and later introduce a sys.platlibdir property, which returns
the correct value on RPM-based systems.

The change to a distutils package not provided by Fedora on Python 3.7
and 3.8 causes a regression in distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib() that
ultimately causes false positives to be emitted by pylint, because it
can no longer find the system source libraries.

Many Python tools are fairly aggressive about updating setuptools
packages, and so even though this package is a fair bit newer than
Python 3.7/3.8, it's not entirely unreasonable for a given user to have
such a modern package with a fairly old Python interpreter.

Updates to Python 3.7 and Python 3.8 are being produced for Fedora which
will fix the problem on up-to-date systems. Until then, we can force the
loading of platform-provided distutils when running the pylint
test. This is the least-invasive yet most comprehensive fix.

References:
 pypa/setuptools#2896
 pylint-dev/pylint#5704
 pypa/distutils#110

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220204221804.2047468-2-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
@0-wiz-0
Copy link

0-wiz-0 commented Mar 4, 2022

I didn't want to open a new issue for this, but I think there's a problem related to the override file.
pkgsrc's python packages install ${PREFIX}/lib/python${PYTHON_VERSION}/site-packages/_distutils_system_mod.py files, they are very small:

# _distutils_system_mod

import distutils.sysconfig


vars(distutils.sysconfig).update(
    _makefile_tmpl='config-{python_ver}{build_flags}',
    _sysconfig_name_tmpl='_sysconfigdata_{platform}',
)

This works in all the normal use cases. However, there seems to be a problem with virtualenv not copying that file:
TritonDataCenter/pkgsrc#323

Is this a bug in virtualenv?

@0-wiz-0
Copy link

0-wiz-0 commented Mar 8, 2022

I've filed pypa/virtualenv#2313 for this.

@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Mar 12, 2022

The problem here may be that there's no strategic design for how _distutils_system_mod is meant to work. I'd be disinclined to recommend that tools like virtualenv and pip need to start honoring this file specially. On the other hand, since these tools previously would copy patched copies of distutils from the stdlib, maybe it's not so bad that they now also need to copy the monkeypatches needed by distutils as found in setuptools.

The long-term solution here is going to be to remove distutils' own reliance on distutils.sysconfig and instead rely on sysconfig.

archlinux-github pushed a commit to archlinux/aur that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2022
setuptools uses its own copy of distutils which breaks the build
in a chroot if setuptools >= 65.6.1 (65.6.0 seems to work).

Setting SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=stdlib solves the problem for now

Ref:
[1] pypa/setuptools#2896
[2] https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/history.html#v60-0-0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants