Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Order navigation groups manually or alphabetically #2859

Closed
philipschilling opened this issue Jul 6, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Order navigation groups manually or alphabetically #2859

philipschilling opened this issue Jul 6, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@philipschilling
Copy link

The navigation groups under website.com/admin/navigation are currently ordered by database ID or similar. If you have many navigation groups (e.g. for multiple languages), it becomes soon disorganized. It would be good to order them alphabetically (then you could also use 1, 2, 3, ... in the navigation group name for order) or manually similar as the drag'n'drop functionality for pages.

@philipschilling
Copy link
Author

A similar issue I found in the drop-down when selecting a page for a navigation item. I have now a very long list in the dropdown and when adding another navigation item, it's even with the search functionality difficult to find it. The order seems to be by creation date/time.

@philipschilling
Copy link
Author

The user groups are sorted by date of entry and not alphabetically which would be nicer ;-)

@huglester
Copy link
Contributor

PR would be welcome to order them manually I think :) this would be best.
so most important are on the top. and others on the bottom

@RyanThompson
Copy link
Member

3.0 uses a flat navigation that is sortable by setting / preference too. In some cases though it's best to simply override the view to set a client's specific ordered needs / display logic.

For 2.2.. Sortable would be cool but might be other things to focus on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants