New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove codecov #1205
Comments
cant see that coverage is a useful stat for the metapackage. I say we toss it |
Do we want to simply turn off CodeCov or remove completely?
|
Turning off makes sense to me. |
This will have to done by someone with full admin privileges. |
i deselected pysal on the repos in our organization account that codecov reports. I'm assuming that takes care of it? |
I would think so. Let's try a toy PR to check? |
resolved in #1207 |
We are testing the imports, but codecov isn't designed to see this.
In this case, codecov is more annoying than helpful. I think we should remove it from the meta package unless someone can figure out a way to make it more useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: