-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TIEGCM comparison additions #232
Conversation
… into tiegcm_comparison
Adding latest develop commits to sort out recent testing bugs. |
Thanks Jeff!
On Jun 4, 2019, at 9:22 AM, Jeff Klenzing <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:
Adding latest develop commits to sort out recent testing bugs.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#232>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3N26PVIVCLSK6FJB42RYDPYWYSTANCNFSM4HSUW2LQ>.
|
def satellite_view_through_model(sat, tie, scoords, tlabels): | ||
"""Interpolates model values onto satellite orbital path. | ||
|
||
""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
needs proper docstring #TheEyeOfBurrell
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved once docstring is fixed. We can add the unit tests in 2.1.0.
Added a tentative docstring based on my reading of the code. Also generalized inputs in case a string rather than a list of strings is input for either scoords or tlabels. @rstoneback, am I interpreting this right? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tiegcm tag labels refer to IVM
Thanks for iterating on this Jeff. The module itself needs a bit of work. Parts of the data are linear, others are log. I need to work on ensuring consistency.
Already in Santa Fe?
On Jun 16, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Jeff Klenzing <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:
@jklenzing commented on this pull request.
Tiegcm tag labels refer to IVM
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#232>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3N26M7SOLXTBLM4W4MUQLP22ORVANCNFSM4HSUW2LQ>.
|
DFW airport. Was talking with Asher about TIEGCM capabilities, which is how I noticed this. |
Heh. Sounds like everyone is at the same gate. I should mosey back that way.
On Jun 16, 2019, at 3:38 PM, Jeff Klenzing <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:
DFW airport. Was talking with Asher about TIEGCM capabilities, which is how I noticed this.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#232>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3N26LILYOOOP2HPBJVYRDP22QDPANCNFSM4HSUW2LQ>.
|
Just switched to E35. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sure to write up an issue for the linear / log stuff.
This pull includes a bugfix for the file format keyword in tiegcm. It also includes a first pass at fast interpolation for TIEGCM values along the satellite track. The method is sound but still needs to be updated to account for the log scaling of some TIEGCM parameters.
Creating this pull now before I forget about the changes II made a few months ago.