We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
According to the standard (http://smtlib.cs.uiowa.edu/papers/smt-lib-reference-v2.5-r2015-05-28.pdf ) (get-model) should return a list of definition of the form define-fun.
We ignore this, because our get-model simply calls get-value for all variables defined in the formula. We should support reading the model with get-model. See work by Liana H on https://github.com/SMT-COMP/postprocessors/tree/master/model-validation-track
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
According to the standard (http://smtlib.cs.uiowa.edu/papers/smt-lib-reference-v2.5-r2015-05-28.pdf ) (get-model) should return a list of definition of the form define-fun.
We ignore this, because our get-model simply calls get-value for all variables defined in the formula. We should support reading the model with get-model. See work by Liana H on https://github.com/SMT-COMP/postprocessors/tree/master/model-validation-track
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: