Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support executemany #20

Closed
fantix opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Support executemany #20

fantix opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@fantix
Copy link
Member

fantix commented Jul 27, 2017

No description provided.

@fantix fantix modified the milestones: 0.2, 0.3 Jul 27, 2017
@fantix fantix modified the milestones: 0.3, 0.4 Aug 7, 2017
@fantix fantix modified the milestones: 0.4, 0.5 Aug 15, 2017
qdzzyb2014 pushed a commit to qdzzyb2014/gino that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2017
qdzzyb2014 pushed a commit to qdzzyb2014/gino that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2017
qdzzyb2014 added a commit to qdzzyb2014/gino that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2017
qdzzyb2014 pushed a commit to qdzzyb2014/gino that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2017
qdzzyb2014 pushed a commit to qdzzyb2014/gino that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2017
qdzzyb2014 added a commit to qdzzyb2014/gino that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2017
@qdzzyb2014 qdzzyb2014 removed their assignment Nov 4, 2017
@fantix
Copy link
Member Author

fantix commented Feb 26, 2018

New interface supports the traditional executemany with status. Actually all, first and scalar also support feeding a list of parameters to multiparams, we just need to make the returning value correct.

@fantix fantix closed this as completed in b471c32 Feb 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants