attempt at a fix for the rooted flag

[glyph]

Fixes #90

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #91 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #91      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.51%   98.53%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        1546     1568      +22     
  Branches      177      179       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1523     1545      +22     
  Misses         12       12              
  Partials       11       11

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/hyperlink/_url.py	96.93% <100%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
src/hyperlink/test/test_url.py	99.81% <100%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7d33145...56b1dd3. Read the comment docs.

[glyph]

@wsanchez @mahmoud anybody up for a review

[wsanchez]

This looks fine to me, given the way the code works now, but I guess I don't understand why rooted is an argument to URL in the first place.

Shouldn't it just be a computed (perhaps cached) property instead of a user-defined attribute?

[wsanchez]

I guess my question is really just aspirational; the API is what it is.

[glyph]

I guess my question is really just aspirational; the API is what it is.

I think the question still deserves answering, since this API is super subtle. The main thing I'd say about this is that it does make a lot more sense than attempting to deal with nonsensical values for path, but still always get the right number of slashes, and not use different data structures for relative and absolute URLs.