Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement should_fail #19

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 10, 2017
Merged

Implement should_fail #19

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 10, 2017

Conversation

spookylukey
Copy link
Member

@bugaevc This pulls in your should_fail method, with a change (mandatory description parameter, otherwise parse failure messages are just `expected 'should fail'), plus docs.

I'm running out of energy/time to implement other things like many_till etc, but this seems to me to be a good enough building block for now.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 7, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 31d6013 on implement_should_fail into 27e1787 on master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 31d6013 on implement_should_fail into 27e1787 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 31d6013 on implement_should_fail into 27e1787 on master.

@spookylukey spookylukey merged commit 31d6013 into master Oct 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants