-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: improve operation messages and make them stateful #9245
Draft
bswck
wants to merge
5
commits into
python-poetry:main
Choose a base branch
from
bswck:feat/stateful-operations
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+212
−120
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ab9a01d
feat: change "Writing lock file" message to "Lock file written"
bswck 8d279df
feat: use past tense in the "Installing the current project" message …
bswck 76a5c8a
refactor: make 'Operation' objects stateful and responsible for forma…
bswck 0a067ae
refactor: deprecate 'Executor.get_operation_message()'
bswck e80c1e8
refactor: ensure backward compatibility of deprecated `get_operation_…
bswck File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we have this stateful as well? Like,
Writing lock file
changing toLock file written
once the operation is done?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well then, I guess that a new IO section would be needed and the
poetry/src/poetry/packages/locker.py
Lines 255 to 257 in fe9f85b
snippet would probably have to be rewritten to
Is it worth the cost? It would require introducing a side effect in
_write_lock_file
or adding some extra logic toset_lock_data
. IO writes are quite fast in contrary to installation operations; the only advantage it would bring is that it could inform about a potentially (but very rarely) erroneous action taken (in case the write fails) useful as a context for a traceback following the message.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, then maybe we could do something like
Writing lock file... Done.
whereDone.
appears after the operation is finished?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that would be inconsistent with the rest of the UI. Also, would it address the issue with additional logic/necessity of introducing new
_write_lock_file
side effects somehow?