New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
API 6.8 #3853
API 6.8 #3853
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey! Looks like you edited README.rst or README_RAW.rst. I'm just a friendly reminder to apply relevant changes to both of those files :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! I've left a few comments. IISC the only mismatch with the Bot API left is the arguments of PollAnswer
becoming optional.
In addition to adding the new functionality, we must also remove all deprecations & backward compatibility layers we introduced for API 6.7, in accordance to our stability policy. This should be done in a separate PR IMO. Still, I'm adding it to the checklist for completeness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the updates! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Found one more item in the checklist - otherwise I'm happy :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, then :) @clot27 @harshil21 do you have anything to add? @lemontree210 @Poolitzer do you want to review as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And we should change the int attribute to datetime as well hmmm.
Do we have other empty classes trigger attachment? Because this feels wrong to me tbh.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice backwards compatibility change
@Poolitzer Uff how did we miss that. Yes the expiration date need to be converted to datetime. |
Checklist
.. versionadded:: NEXT.VERSION
,.. versionchanged:: NEXT.VERSION
or.. deprecated:: NEXT.VERSION
to the docstrings for user facing changes (for methods/class descriptions, arguments and attributes)CSI standard <https://standards.mousepawmedia.com/en/stable/csi.html>
__AUTHORS.rst
(optional)__all__
sStability Policy <https://docs.python-telegram-bot.org/stability_policy.html>
_ in case of deprecations or changes to documented behaviorIf the PR contains API changes (otherwise, you can ignore this passage)
Checked the Bot API specific sections of the
Stability Policy <https://docs.python-telegram-bot.org/stability_policy.html>
_New classes:
self._id_attrs
and corresponding documentation__init__
acceptsapi_kwargs
as kw-onlyAdded new shortcuts:
~telegram.Chat
& :class:~telegram.User
for all methods that acceptchat/user_id
~telegram.Message
for all methods that acceptchat_id
andmessage_id
~telegram.Message
shortcuts: Addedquote
argument if methods acceptsreply_to_message_id
~telegram.CallbackQuery
for all methods that accept eitherchat_id
andmessage_id
orinline_message_id
If relevant:
telegram.constants
and shortcuts to them as class variablestelegram.Message.effective_attachment
~telegram.ext.ConversationHandler
_extbot.py
bot_methods.rst
README.rst
andREADME_RAW.rst
(including the badge), as well astelegram.constants.BOT_API_VERSION_INFO
telegram.ext.ExtBot
for new methods that either accept areply_markup
in some form or have a return type that is/contains :class:~telegram.Message