[3.12] gh-109719: Fix missing jump target labels when compiler reorde…

…rs cold/warm blocks (GH-109734) (#109749)

gh-109719: Fix missing jump target labels when compiler reorders cold/warm blocks (GH-109734)
(cherry picked from commit 7c55399)

Co-authored-by: Irit Katriel <1055913+iritkatriel@users.noreply.github.com>

Lib/test/test_compile.py

@@ -1225,6 +1225,17 @@ def f():
                 except:
                     pass
 
+    def test_cold_block_moved_to_end(self):
+        # See gh-109719
+        def f():
+            while name:
+                try:
+                    break
+                except:
+                    pass
+            else:
+                1 if 1 else 1
+
 
 @requires_debug_ranges()
 class TestSourcePositions(unittest.TestCase):

Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2023-09-22-13-38-17.gh-issue-109719.fx5OTz.rst

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Fix missing jump target labels when compiler reorders cold/warm blocks.

Python/flowgraph.c

@@ -1945,6 +1945,8 @@ push_cold_blocks_to_end(cfg_builder *g, int code_flags) {
     }
     RETURN_IF_ERROR(mark_cold(entryblock));
 
+    int next_lbl = get_max_label(g->g_entryblock) + 1;
+
     /* If we have a cold block with fallthrough to a warm block, add */
     /* an explicit jump instead of fallthrough */
     for (basicblock *b = entryblock; b != NULL; b = b->b_next) {
@@ -1953,6 +1955,9 @@ push_cold_blocks_to_end(cfg_builder *g, int code_flags) {
             if (explicit_jump == NULL) {
                 return ERROR;
             }
+            if (!IS_LABEL(b->b_next->b_label)) {
+                b->b_next->b_label.id = next_lbl++;
+            }
             basicblock_addop(explicit_jump, JUMP, b->b_next->b_label.id, NO_LOCATION);
             explicit_jump->b_cold = 1;
             explicit_jump->b_next = b->b_next;