Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xmlrpclib.binary doesn't exist #43114

Closed
catlee mannequin opened this issue Mar 30, 2006 · 2 comments
Closed

xmlrpclib.binary doesn't exist #43114

catlee mannequin opened this issue Mar 30, 2006 · 2 comments
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir

Comments

@catlee
Copy link
Mannequin

catlee mannequin commented Mar 30, 2006

BPO 1461610
Nosy @birkenfeld, @catlee

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2006-03-31.14:35:23.000>
created_at = <Date 2006-03-30.19:52:25.000>
labels = ['docs']
title = "xmlrpclib.binary doesn't exist"
updated_at = <Date 2006-03-31.14:35:23.000>
user = 'https://github.com/catlee'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2006-03-31.14:35:23.000>
actor = 'georg.brandl'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2006-03-30.19:52:25.000>
creator = 'catlee'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 1461610
keywords = []
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['27967', '27968']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['georg.brandl', 'catlee']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue1461610'
versions = []

@catlee
Copy link
Mannequin Author

catlee mannequin commented Mar 30, 2006

The current 2.4 and 2.5 docs mention that the xmlrpclib
has a function
called binary which converts any python value to a
Binary object.

However, this function does not exist in either 2.4.3
or 2.5.

The Binary constructor accepts a data parameter, so I
would say just
remove mention of the binary function from the docs and
leave the
implementation as-is.

@catlee catlee mannequin closed this as completed Mar 30, 2006
@catlee catlee mannequin added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Mar 30, 2006
@catlee catlee mannequin closed this as completed Mar 30, 2006
@catlee catlee mannequin added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Mar 30, 2006
@birkenfeld
Copy link
Member

Logged In: YES
user_id=849994

Removed from documentation.

@ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant