Add .format() method to str and unicode

[crutchergmail]

BPO	1463370
Nosy	@malemburg, @gvanrossum
Files	format.diff: patch to add .format() to str and unicode

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2008-01-06.22:29:46.687>
created_at = <Date 2006-04-03.07:42:31.000>
labels = ['interpreter-core']
title = 'Add .format() method to str and unicode'
updated_at = <Date 2008-01-06.22:29:46.687>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/crutchergmail'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2008-01-06.22:29:46.687>
actor = 'admin'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2006-04-03.07:42:31.000>
creator = 'crutcher_gmail'
dependencies = []
files = ['7138']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 1463370
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 5.0
messages = ['49949', '49950', '49951', '49952', '49953']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['lemburg', 'gvanrossum', 'crutcher_gmail']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'rejected'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue1463370'
versions = ['Python 3.0']

[crutchergmail]

patch to add .format() method to string and unicode types.

[malemburg]

Logged In: YES
user_id=38388

Why would we need a method for formatting ? We already have
the %-based formatting which can also be access via .__mod__().

[gvanrossum]

Logged In: YES
user_id=6380

I like this.

The reason to like this in favor of s%x was expressed by
Walter Dörwald on the python-3000 list:

"""
it avoids one problem you might run into with %:
If you have only one argument, writing s % (x,)
as s % x will break when the
argument x happens to be a tuple.
You won't have this problem with
s.format(x).
"""

However, this might be our chance to introduce a new
formatting syntax, since there are many problems with the %s
style (especially %(foo)s). See PEP-292.

We need a Python 3000 group in the trackers.

[malemburg]

Logged In: YES
user_id=38388

I would rather like to see any non-trivial formatting be
moved into a module and have functions that operate on
strings and Unicode.

Methods on simple types shouldn't really implement any
complicated features.

Formatting is one of those things that everybody wants to
implement in different ways. Just look at the gazillion
different templating engines out there for examples :-)

Better remove the %-formatting altogether in Py3k and add a
module which implements 2.x style %-formatting as well as
PEP-292 style $-formatting.

[gvanrossum]

Logged In: YES
user_id=6380

Let's please continue this discussion on
python-3000@python.org instead of a random SF item.