int() lies about base parameter

[jwilk]

BPO	2844
Nosy	@loewis, @birkenfeld, @rhettinger, @mdickinson, @abalkin, @jwilk
Files	issue2844.diff issue2844-1.diff

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/rhettinger'
closed_at = <Date 2008-05-13.21:50:49.756>
created_at = <Date 2008-05-13.10:03:54.604>
labels = ['type-bug', 'library']
title = 'int() lies about base parameter'
updated_at = <Date 2010-05-27.07:03:21.714>
user = 'https://github.com/jwilk'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2010-05-27.07:03:21.714>
actor = 'mark.dickinson'
assignee = 'rhettinger'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2008-05-13.21:50:49.756>
closer = 'loewis'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2008-05-13.10:03:54.604>
creator = 'jwilk'
dependencies = []
files = ['10316', '10319']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 2844
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 10.0
messages = ['66777', '66779', '66780', '66784', '66785', '66787', '66788', '66805', '67139', '106595']
nosy_count = 7.0
nosy_names = ['loewis', 'georg.brandl', 'rhettinger', 'mark.dickinson', 'belopolsky', 'jwilk', 'hodgestar']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'wont fix'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'behavior'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue2844'
versions = ['Python 2.6', 'Python 2.5', 'Python 2.4', 'Python 3.0']

[jwilk]

>>> int('42', 42)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: int() base must be >= 2 and <= 36

>>> int('42', -909)
42

[hodgestar]

Some quick digging in the code on trunk has revealed that by the time
the base reaches PyInt_FromString in intobject.c, -909 has become 10.
Surrounding numbers seem to come through fine.

[hodgestar]

In int_new in intobject.c the base -909 is used to indicate that no base
has been passed through (presumably because NULL / 0 is a more common
pitfall that -909). Thus -909 is equivalent to base 10.

[abalkin]

The same issue is present in long_new:

>>> long('42', -909)
42L

I don't see why any magic value is needed, 10 would do the trick.

[jwilk]

10 would *not* do the trick:

>>> int(42)
42

>>> int(42, 10)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: int() can't convert non-string with explicit base

[abalkin]

10 would *not* do the trick:

You are right. I guess something like bpo-2844-1.diff will be
necessary. I am not sure it is worth the trouble, though. Maybe just
change -909 to -MAX_INT? Jakub, how did you discover this in the first
place?

[birkenfeld]

I'm -1 on complicating these simple functions. Raymond?

[loewis]

I don't see the problem at all. The -909 value is an implementation
artefact, and the submitter probably wouldn't have known it existed
without reading the source code. Perhaps we should change it to
something different every Python release just to denote that it is
deliberately undocumented.

Closing as "won't fix".

[rhettinger]

Agreed. Totally a non-issue.

[mdickinson]

For py3k, this was fixed in r81557.