RLock support the context manager protocol but this is not documented

[bitdancer]

BPO	13050
Nosy	@birkenfeld, @rhettinger, @bitdancer
Files	issue13050.diff

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2013-04-14.10:31:29.711>
created_at = <Date 2011-09-27.19:02:06.704>
labels = ['docs']
title = 'RLock support the context manager protocol but this is not documented'
updated_at = <Date 2013-04-14.10:31:29.709>
user = 'https://github.com/bitdancer'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2013-04-14.10:31:29.709>
actor = 'georg.brandl'
assignee = 'docs@python'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2013-04-14.10:31:29.711>
closer = 'georg.brandl'
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2011-09-27.19:02:06.704>
creator = 'r.david.murray'
dependencies = []
files = ['24167']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 13050
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 6.0
messages = ['145260', '145268', '150824', '150828', '159535', '186905']
nosy_count = 7.0
nosy_names = ['georg.brandl', 'rhettinger', 'r.david.murray', 'docs@python', 'bbrazil', 'godfryd', 'zacherates']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'out of date'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue13050'
versions = ['Python 3.3']

[bbrazil]

This is already documented:

http://docs.python.org/library/threading.html#using-locks-conditions-and-semaphores-in-the-with-statement

[bitdancer]

Hmm. But what I did was look up the RLock section of the manual to answer the question "does this support the context manager protocol", and the answer appeared to be no. In a reference manual I would expect all the important features of an object to be described in that object's documentation, or linked to therefrom.

[zacherates]

Here is a patch that adds an note about using Locks, RLocks, Conditions, and Semaphores as context managers to each of their descriptions as well as a link to the "Using locks, conditions, and semaphores in the with statement" section.

[rhettinger]

This edit looks reasonable.

[godfryd]

It looks that it is already documented by 76228:2040842626ba changeset.
The bug can be closed.

[birkenfeld]

Thanks, closing.