threading classes' __enter__ should return self

[sbt]

BPO	14116
Nosy	@ncoghlan, @pitrou, @merwok

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2012-03-31.23:33:18.027>
created_at = <Date 2012-02-24.21:03:00.517>
labels = ['type-feature', 'library']
title = "threading classes' __enter__ should return self"
updated_at = <Date 2012-03-31.23:33:18.026>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/sbt'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2012-03-31.23:33:18.026>
actor = 'pitrou'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2012-03-31.23:33:18.027>
closer = 'pitrou'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2012-02-24.21:03:00.517>
creator = 'sbt'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 14116
keywords = []
message_count = 5.0
messages = ['154161', '154196', '154225', '154361', '157242']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['ncoghlan', 'pitrou', 'eric.araujo', 'sbt']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'rejected'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue14116'
versions = ['Python 3.3']

[sbt]

The __enter__() methods of Lock, RLock, Semaphore and Condition in threading (and multiprocessing) all return True. This seems to contradict the documentation for the context protocol which says

  contextmanager.__enter__()

Enter the runtime context and return either this object or 
another object related to the runtime context. The value 
returned by this method is bound to the identifier in the
as clause of with statements using this context manager.

...

I don't think True qualifies as "another object related to the runtime context".

It looks like an oversight caused by making __enter__() an alias for acquire(). Is it reasonable to change this for 3.3? I tripped over the issue when I tried writing

  with Condition() as c:
    ...

[merwok]

IIUC returning True is not incorrect, only useless. In the stdlib I usually see “with lock:”. Can you tell what is the use case for accessing the condition object inside the context block? Does it apply only to Condition or also to *Lock and Semaphore?

[ncoghlan]

"with Lock() as lock:" doesn't make any sense - you need to share the lock with other threads or code for it be useful, which means you can't create it inline in the with statement header. Instead, you have to store it somewhere else (usually as a closure reference or a module, class or instance attribute) and then merely use it in the with statement to acquire and release it appropriately.

Absent a compelling use case, I'm inclined to reject this one - when there's no specifically useful value to return from __enter__, None, True or False are all reasonable alternatives.

[sbt]

IIUC returning True is not incorrect, only useless. In the stdlib I
usually see “with lock:”. Can you tell what is the use case for
accessing the condition object inside the context block? Does it
apply only to Condition or also to *Lock and Semaphore?

I was going to do something like

  with Condition() as c:
    Thread(target=foo, args=(c,...)).start()
    c.wait_for(...)

But I will agree that I don't have a compelling use case.

[pitrou]

Closing then.