Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Argument Clinic: add support for __init__ #64493

Closed
serhiy-storchaka opened this issue Jan 18, 2014 · 13 comments
Closed

Argument Clinic: add support for __init__ #64493

serhiy-storchaka opened this issue Jan 18, 2014 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Comments

@serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

BPO 20294
Nosy @larryhastings, @zware, @serhiy-storchaka
Files
  • larry.argument.clinic.init.and.new.patch.1.txt
  • larry.argument.clinic.init.and.new.patch.2.txt
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/larryhastings'
    closed_at = <Date 2014-01-19.07:51:59.784>
    created_at = <Date 2014-01-18.11:43:26.038>
    labels = ['type-feature']
    title = 'Argument Clinic: add support for __init__'
    updated_at = <Date 2014-01-22.03:13:07.590>
    user = 'https://github.com/serhiy-storchaka'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2014-01-22.03:13:07.590>
    actor = 'larry'
    assignee = 'larry'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2014-01-19.07:51:59.784>
    closer = 'larry'
    components = ['Demos and Tools']
    creation = <Date 2014-01-18.11:43:26.038>
    creator = 'serhiy.storchaka'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['33537', '33542']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 20294
    keywords = []
    message_count = 13.0
    messages = ['208395', '208406', '208412', '208413', '208444', '208451', '208453', '208458', '208459', '208460', '208461', '208497', '208739']
    nosy_count = 5.0
    nosy_names = ['larry', 'rmsr', 'python-dev', 'zach.ware', 'serhiy.storchaka']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue20294'
    versions = ['Python 3.4']

    @serhiy-storchaka
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Currently Argument Clinic doesn't support the __init__ methods, mainly because the C implementation of this method should return int, not PyObject *. In some cases it is possible to wrap a function generated by Argument Clinic (as in Modules/_pickle.c). But not always, because the __init__ method is called with the self, args, and kwargs arguments, while Argument Clinic can generate function without kwargs.

    @serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka added the type-feature A feature request or enhancement label Jan 18, 2014
    @larryhastings
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Oh! I thought it worked fine, because I've seen people convert both an __init__ and a __new__. But I guess they wrapped them.

    It's an easy change, I can try to do that today.

    @larryhastings larryhastings self-assigned this Jan 18, 2014
    @larryhastings
    Copy link
    Contributor

    • As is probably expected, __init__ and __call__ procs
      can't be converted.

    I should have a fix in for __init__ and __call__ later today. (Issue bpo-20294.)
    For the record, you could convert them, you just had to wrap the parsing function
    to deal with the return type difference, and *args / **kwargs might be tricky too.

    * sqlite3.Connection.{execute, executemany, executescript} don't use
      PyArg_Parse*.
    

    In the next few days I'm going to add support for "*args" and "**kwargs", and
    then you'll be able to convert these functions. (Issue bpo-20291.) Again, even
    if Argument Clinic doesn't do any parsing, it's still helpful to have it
    generate signatures.

    * The clinic version of 'sqlite3.adapt' has an argument string of "O|OO".
      The first optional parameter defaults to 'pysqlite_PrepareProtocolType'
      in C and 'sqlite3.ProtocolType' in Python.  However, I don't know how to
      represent the Python value because Python default values are 'eval'd by
      clinic \*and* the 'sqlite3' module is not imported for the eval.
    

    You'll be able to do this soon:

    parameter: object(c_default='pysqlite_PrepareProtocolType') = ProtocolType

    This feature isn't checked in yet, I'm waiting for a review. It's part of
    bpo-20226, which I guess you already noticed.

    • The clinic version of 'sqlite3.Cursor.fetchmany' has an arguments string
      of "|i". The first parameter defaults to
      '((pysqlite_Cursor *)self)->arraysize' in C and 'self.arraysize' in
      Python. I don't know how to express the Python initialization.

    You can't. How about you use a default of -1 and then:

    if (maxrows == -1)
    maxrows = self->arraysize

    • I didn't convert 'sqlite3.Cursor.setinputsizes' and
      'sqlite3.Cursor.setoutputsize' because they share a docstring and
      simple no-op method def.

    I'd prefer it if you converted them anyway. Converting them means they'll
    have signature information which is an unconditional good.

    • I didn't convert 'sqlite.connect' because it would have required
      packaing the arguments back up to pass to 'PyObject_Call'.

    Once I add the ability to pass in *args and **kwargs, you'll be able to
    convert sqlite.connect.

    I think I responded to all your other comments when I reviewed the patch.

    Thanks!

    @larryhastings
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Oops, sorry, that last comment was intended for a different issue. Please ignore, and sorry for the spam!

    @larryhastings
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Here's a patch. Wasn't as easy as I thought, it kind of took all day.

    Changes include:

    • __init__ and __new__ always take kwargs.
      • if the function signature doesn't accept keyword arguments,
        it calls _PyArg_NoKeywords().
    • __init__ returns int, not PyObject *.
    • __init__ and __new__ should support all argument parsing
      scenarios (unpack tuple, positional only, etc).

    Pre-exiting behavior:

    • The C function basename chosen for __new__ is just the name of
      the class, it doesn't end in __new__.
    • The methoddef #define is suppressed.

    @zware
    Copy link
    Member

    zware commented Jan 19, 2014

    Rietveld doesn't like the patch and I'm having a hard time finding a changeset on which I can get it to apply cleanly. May I suggest avoiding --git on hg diff unless copying/moving/renaming a file?

    @larryhastings
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Whoops, that doesn't apply cleanly. Here's an updated patch.

    @zware
    Copy link
    Member

    zware commented Jan 19, 2014

    Output looks good and I didn't see anything that scared me in the patch, though I can't pretend to fully understand 100% of it. Builds on Windows, pickle tests pass, and nothing else is affected (that's checked in so far). Looks good to me, as far as I can see.

    @rmsr
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    rmsr mannequin commented Jan 19, 2014

    I have reviewed this as best I am able. I'll be honest that a lot of clinic.py makes my eyes cross; I'm used to webdev templating, which is inverted from AC (flow control inside the template). Not complaining, it's a complicated subject. I do like the centralization of the templates.

    I didn't see anything that jumped out at me. I tried out the new conversions on socketmodule and like the output, and none of the existing conversions mutated. So LGTM!

    It took me a while to figure out how to make __new__ a class method though, decorator support should probably be documented (or else a hint like '__new__ must be a @classmethod!')

    @python-dev
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    python-dev mannequin commented Jan 19, 2014

    New changeset 2e32462e4832 by Larry Hastings in branch 'default':
    Issue bpo-20294: Argument Clinic now supports argument parsing for __new__ and
    http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2e32462e4832

    @larryhastings
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Checked in. Thanks for bringing the problem to my attention, Serhiy, and thanks for the reviews you two!

    rmsr: If I had a stronger background in templating, maybe Argument Clinic would be cleaner inside. As it is I'm beating the problem to death with sheer force of will.

    @serhiy-storchaka
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Thank you Larry, now I can use Argument Clinic in the __init__ methods. But there is one problem.

    Docstring generated for the __init__ method contains the "__init__" name in the signature. Therefore it can't be used as class docstring. On other hand, the compiler complains of not used __init__ docstring.

    @larryhastings
    Copy link
    Contributor

    That problem will be irrelevant, once builtin classes support signatures (bpo-20189).

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
    AA-Turner pushed a commit to AA-Turner/devguide that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2023
    erlend-aasland pushed a commit to python/devguide that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2023
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    type-feature A feature request or enhancement
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    3 participants