gh-108525: Clarify stable ABI documentation to exclude internal C libraries #108582
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I feel that this is not the right place for this note, since in this case the user is not really interacting with the C API. Why would someone look here? In what situation would you use an internal extension with a different build of Python? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #108525
Please see issue #108525 for background. I could not find any information in the documentation on if ABI compatibility between bugfix release shared objects is a warranty. However, using the private API in the C support libraries like _ssl appears to be common and would cause ABI breakage on private API changes.
If this interpretation is incorrect, please let me know as I think clarification would be helpful regardless.
馃摎 Documentation preview 馃摎: https://cpython-previews--108582.org.readthedocs.build/