GH-109190: Copyedit 3.12 What's New: bytecode (LOAD_METHOD) #109665
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bedevere-app
bot
added
awaiting review
docs
|
Thanks @AA-Turner for the PR, and @ambv for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2023
…thonGH-109665) (cherry picked from commit d9415f6) Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com> bytecode: suppress reference to removed LOAD_METHOD
|
GH-109728 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
csm10495
pushed a commit
to csm10495/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2023
…thon#109665) bytecode: suppress reference to removed LOAD_METHOD
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
LOAD_METHOD. This opcode was removed in MergeLOAD_METHODback intoLOAD_ATTRfor better specialization #93429, but Add virtual opcodes to the dis/opcodes modules #94216 introduced new pseudo instructions reusing the name. I believe that this cross reference is consequently currently wrong.📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--109665.org.readthedocs.build/en/109665/whatsnew/3.12.html#cpython-bytecode-changes