Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.11] GH-113214: Fix SSLProto exception handling in SSL-over-SSL scenarios (GH-113334) #113340

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 21, 2023

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Dec 20, 2023

When wrapped, _SSLProtocolTransport._force_close(exc) is called just like in the unwrapped scenario _SelectorTransport._force_close(exc) or _ProactorBasePipeTransport._force_close(exc) would be called, except here the exception needs to be passed through the SSLProtocol._abort() method, which didn't accept an exception object.

This commit ensures that this path works, in the same way that the uvloop implementation of SSLProto passes on the exception (on which the current implementation of SSLProto is based).
(cherry picked from commit 1ff0238)

Co-authored-by: Martijn Pieters mj@zopatista.com

…arios (pythonGH-113334)

When wrapped, `_SSLProtocolTransport._force_close(exc)` is called just like in the unwrapped scenario `_SelectorTransport._force_close(exc)` or `_ProactorBasePipeTransport._force_close(exc)` would be called, except here the exception needs to be passed through the `SSLProtocol._abort()` method, which didn't accept an exception object.

This commit ensures that this path works, in the same way that the uvloop implementation of SSLProto passes on the exception (on which the current implementation of SSLProto is based).
(cherry picked from commit 1ff0238)

Co-authored-by: Martijn Pieters <mj@zopatista.com>
@gvanrossum gvanrossum merged commit 9cbe473 into python:3.11 Dec 21, 2023
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants