Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-36951: Correct some types in the type_members struct in typeobject.c #13403

Merged

Conversation

ZackerySpytz
Copy link
Contributor

@ZackerySpytz ZackerySpytz commented May 18, 2019

Copy link
Contributor

@jdemeyer jdemeyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is obviously the right thing to do.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ZackerySpytz for the PR, and @benjaminp for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7, 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
…peobject.c. (pythonGH-13403)

(cherry picked from commit 53d378c)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz <zspytz@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-13433 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-13434 is a backport of this pull request to the 2.7 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
…peobject.c. (pythonGH-13403)

(cherry picked from commit 53d378c)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz <zspytz@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
…peobject.c. (GH-13403)

(cherry picked from commit 53d378c)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz <zspytz@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
…peobject.c. (GH-13403)

(cherry picked from commit 53d378c)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz <zspytz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants