Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.8] bpo-38002: Use False/True for IDLE pyshell bools (GH-19203) #19207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 28, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Mar 28, 2020

Change 0/1 assignments to 'executing', 'canceled', 'reading', 'endoffile'.
These are not used outside of pyshell. Other bools already use False/True.
Add comment about int needed for Windows call.
Remove self.more, unused in idlelib and code.InteractiveInterpreter.
The latter uses 'more' as a local.
(cherry picked from commit 34a49aa)

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy tjreedy@udel.edu

https://bugs.python.org/issue38002

Change 0/1 assignments to 'executing', 'canceled', 'reading', 'endoffile'.
These are not used outside of pyshell. Other bools already use False/True.
Add comment about int needed for Windows call.
Remove self.more, unused in idlelib and code.InteractiveInterpreter.
The latter uses 'more' as a local.
(cherry picked from commit 34a49aa)

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@terryjreedy: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 8c3ab18 into python:3.8 Mar 28, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-34a49aa-3.8 branch March 28, 2020 17:16
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@terryjreedy: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@terryjreedy: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants