Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.8] bpo-40327: Improve atomicity, speed, and memory efficiency of the items() loop (GH-19628) #19640

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 22, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Apr 21, 2020

(cherry picked from commit 75bedbe)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger rhettinger@users.noreply.github.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue40327

…ms() loop (pythonGH-19628)

(cherry picked from commit 75bedbe)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <rhettinger@users.noreply.github.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhettinger: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhettinger: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhettinger: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 16d0781 into python:3.8 May 22, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-75bedbe-3.8 branch May 22, 2020 22:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Performance or resource usage skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants