Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.9] bpo-40830: Make sure that keyword arguments are merged into the arguments dictionary when dict unpacking and keyword arguments are interleaved. (GH-20553) #20569

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 1, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jun 1, 2020

bpo-40830: Make sure that keyword arguments are merged into the arguments dictionary when dict unpacking and keyword arguments are interleaved.
(cherry picked from commit db64f12)

Co-authored-by: Mark Shannon mark@hotpy.org

https://bugs.python.org/issue40830

…nary when dict unpacking and keyword arguments are interleaved. (pythonGH-20553)

(cherry picked from commit db64f12)

Co-authored-by: Mark Shannon <mark@hotpy.org>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error awaiting review labels Jun 1, 2020
@markshannon markshannon changed the title [3.9] Make sure that keyword arguments are merged into the arguments dictionary when dict unpacking and keyword arguments are interleaved. (GH-20553) bpo-40830: [3.9] Make sure that keyword arguments are merged into the arguments dictionary when dict unpacking and keyword arguments are interleaved. (GH-20553) Jun 1, 2020
@markshannon markshannon changed the title bpo-40830: [3.9] Make sure that keyword arguments are merged into the arguments dictionary when dict unpacking and keyword arguments are interleaved. (GH-20553) [3.9] bpo-40830: Make sure that keyword arguments are merged into the arguments dictionary when dict unpacking and keyword arguments are interleaved. (GH-20553) Jun 1, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@markshannon: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@markshannon: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@markshannon: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@markshannon markshannon merged commit 410b730 into python:3.9 Jun 1, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-db64f12-3.9 branch June 1, 2020 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants