Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-41891: ensure asyncio.wait_for waits for task completion #22461

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 18, 2020

Conversation

rkojedzinszky
Copy link
Contributor

@rkojedzinszky rkojedzinszky commented Sep 30, 2020

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

CLA Missing

Our records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA:

@rkojedzinszky

For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@1st1
Copy link
Member

1st1 commented Oct 1, 2020

@elprans please take a look. You've been fixing wait_for for quite some time.

@elprans
Copy link
Contributor

elprans commented Oct 1, 2020

The fix looks good to me. Needs a test, though.

asyncio.wait_for should wait for the future to terminate in all cases.
@1st1 1st1 added needs backport to 3.8 only security fixes needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes labels Dec 18, 2020
@1st1 1st1 merged commit 17ef431 into python:master Dec 18, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @rkojedzinszky for the PR, and @1st1 for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8, 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

@1st1: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2020
…H-22461)

(cherry picked from commit 17ef431)

Co-authored-by: Richard Kojedzinszky <rkojedzinszky@users.noreply.github.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Dec 18, 2020
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-23840 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2020
…H-22461)

(cherry picked from commit 17ef431)

Co-authored-by: Richard Kojedzinszky <rkojedzinszky@users.noreply.github.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.8 only security fixes label Dec 18, 2020
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-23841 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 17ef431)

Co-authored-by: Richard Kojedzinszky <rkojedzinszky@users.noreply.github.com>
1st1 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2020
… (#23840)

(cherry picked from commit 17ef431)

Co-authored-by: Richard Kojedzinszky <rkojedzinszky@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Richard Kojedzinszky <rkojedzinszky@users.noreply.github.com>
adorilson pushed a commit to adorilson/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2021
@rkojedzinszky rkojedzinszky deleted the fix-issue-41891 branch January 11, 2023 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants