bpo-43837: Reverse order of precedence table to show tightly binding operators first #25469
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ammaraskar
changed the title
rhettinger
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2021
|
Thanks @ammaraskar for the PR, and @rhettinger for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9. |
|
GH-25472 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2021
…operators first (pythonGH-25469) (cherry picked from commit 68ba0c6) Co-authored-by: Ammar Askar <ammar@ammaraskar.com>
kreathon
pushed a commit
to kreathon/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned in the bug, this is an obvious improvement that makes the table more natural and brings it in-line with precedence tables from other languages.
https://bugs.python.org/issue43837