Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-44702: Remove ambiguity in sentence #27676

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 9, 2021
Merged

Conversation

dukecat0
Copy link
Contributor

@dukecat0 dukecat0 commented Aug 9, 2021

https://bugs.python.org/issue44702

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:pablogsal

@pablogsal
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @meowmeowmeowcat and congrats on your first PR! 🎉

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@meowmeowmeowcat: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 03e5647 into python:main Aug 9, 2021
@dukecat0 dukecat0 deleted the patch-2 branch August 9, 2021 12:02
Not all objects can be weakly referenced; those objects which can include class
instances, functions written in Python (but not in C), instance methods, sets,
frozensets, some :term:`file objects <file object>`, :term:`generators <generator>`,
Not all objects can be weakly referenced. Objects which support weak references
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps change "which" to "that".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with your suggestion. However, is it worth to open a new PR for fixing this?

@Prometheus3375 Prometheus3375 mannequin mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants