Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bpo-45847: Revert Port _ctypes partly to PY_STDLIB_MOD (GH-29747) (GH-29969) #29969

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2021
Merged

bpo-45847: Revert Port _ctypes partly to PY_STDLIB_MOD (GH-29747) (GH-29969) #29969

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2021

Conversation

tiran
Copy link
Member

@tiran tiran commented Dec 7, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

@tiran tiran requested a review from pablogsal December 7, 2021 18:39
@tiran tiran added skip news 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section labels Dec 7, 2021
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @tiran for commit 20d6233 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Dec 7, 2021
@tiran
Copy link
Member Author

tiran commented Dec 7, 2021

buildbot/x86 Gentoo Non-Debug with X PR is passing again.

@tiran tiran changed the title bpo-45847: Revert Port _ctypes partly to PY_STDLIB_MOD (GH-29747) bpo-45847: Revert Port _ctypes partly to PY_STDLIB_MOD (GH-29747) (GH-29969) Dec 7, 2021
@tiran tiran merged commit 91b59a3 into python:main Dec 7, 2021
@tiran tiran deleted the bpo-45847-revert-ctypes branch December 7, 2021 19:56
@tiran tiran mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pablogsal pablogsal pablogsal approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@tiran @bedevere-bot @pablogsal @the-knights-who-say-ni