Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.10] bpo-47235: Note where a typo is intentional in code. (GH-32348) #32367

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 6, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Apr 6, 2022

People keep popping up reporting these as typos in the docs despite
being described as typos in the surrounding text. Hopefully a comment
on the line itself makes it more obvious?

Arguably some of the typo examples are not using the "right" typo as the
"assret" one in particular is now detected by default due to how common
it was in actual code. But I don't want to to typo chasing by changing
these examples to be other not yet auto-detected typos as they still
illustrate the point well enough.
(cherry picked from commit ac1fb07)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith greg@krypto.org

https://bugs.python.org/issue47235

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead

People keep popping up reporting these as typos in the docs despite
being described as typos in the surrounding text.  Hopefully a comment
on the line itself makes it more obvious?

Arguably some of the typo examples are not using the "right" typo as the
"assret" one in particular is now detected by default due to how common
it was in actual code.  But I don't want to to typo chasing by changing
these examples to be other not yet auto-detected typos as they still
illustrate the point well enough.
(cherry picked from commit ac1fb07)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 3 of 6 required status checks are expected..

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 3 of 6 required status checks are expected..

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 3856b49 into python:3.10 Apr 6, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-ac1fb07-3.10 branch April 6, 2022 15:30
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants