Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc #4469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 27, 2017
Merged

bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc #4469

merged 1 commit into from Nov 27, 2017

Conversation

1a1a11a
Copy link
Contributor

@1a1a11a 1a1a11a commented Nov 19, 2017

Remove name conflict under "Using a remove manager" section, the original usage of queue conflicts with module name queue.

https://bugs.python.org/issue32051

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@1a1a11a 1a1a11a changed the title Issue 32051 update multiprocessing doc [issue 32051] update multiprocessing doc Nov 19, 2017
@1a1a11a 1a1a11a changed the title [issue 32051] update multiprocessing doc bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc Nov 19, 2017
@1a1a11a
Copy link
Contributor Author

1a1a11a commented Nov 19, 2017

I have signed the CLA, waiting for system to pass and re-check.

@@ -1837,8 +1837,8 @@ Running the following commands creates a server for a single shared queue which
remote clients can access::

>>> from multiprocessing.managers import BaseManager
>>> import queue
>>> queue = queue.Queue()
>>> from multiprocessing import Queue
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think multiprocessing.Queue is needed here. We don't communicate between different processes in the same machine so using queue.Queue is OK.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you for the comment, what should I do now? Should I make the change and submit a new pull request?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You don't need to submit a new pull request. You can make the requested changes and push to your existing branch. In your case, that would be the master branch.

You can follow the guide at https://devguide.python.org/pullrequest/#step-by-step-guide for your future pull requests.

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
Remove name conflict under "Using a remove manager" section, the original
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to add a NEWS entry for trivial documentation changes. Please delete this file.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@1a1a11a 1a1a11a left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with this.

@1a1a11a
Copy link
Contributor Author

1a1a11a commented Nov 26, 2017

I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@berkerpeksag: please review the changes made to this pull request.

Remove name conflict under "Using a remove manager" section
@1a1a11a 1a1a11a changed the title bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc [skip news] Nov 27, 2017
@1a1a11a 1a1a11a changed the title bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc [skip news] bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc skip-news Nov 27, 2017
@1a1a11a 1a1a11a changed the title bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc skip-news bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc [skip-news] Nov 27, 2017
@1a1a11a
Copy link
Contributor Author

1a1a11a commented Nov 27, 2017

btw, how do I add skip news label?

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag changed the title bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc [skip-news] bpo-32051: update multiprocessing doc Nov 27, 2017
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @1a1a11a for the PR, and @berkerpeksag for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-4577 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2017
@berkerpeksag
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

Labels can only be set by Python core developers or bots like bedevere.

berkerpeksag pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2017
@1a1a11a
Copy link
Contributor Author

1a1a11a commented Nov 27, 2017

thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants