Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-33082: Include multiprocessing Pool callback in example & docstrings #6455

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chadmiller-amzn
Copy link

@chadmiller-amzn chadmiller-amzn commented Apr 12, 2018

Also make the callback docs more clear as to how data flows.

Callbacks are executed in the main process. The callback input values are the
return values of the called function, when that function exits, or an exception
instance in error_callbacks if it is raised.

https://bugs.python.org/issue33082

Also make the callback docs more clear as to how data flows.

Callbacks are executed in the main process. The callback input values are the
return values of the called function, when that function exits, or an exception
instance in error_callbacks if it is raised.
@chadmiller-amzn chadmiller-amzn changed the title Include multiprocessing Pool callback in example & docstrings bpo-33082: Include multiprocessing Pool callback in example & docstrings Apr 12, 2018
@ned-deily
Copy link
Member

Awaiting review of 2.7 version of PR (#6122)

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Dec 8, 2018
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

I removed the " needs backport to 3.6" label, the 3.6 branch no longer accept bugfixes (only security fixes are accepted): https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches

@csabella csabella requested a review from applio May 18, 2019 12:25
@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

@applio, please check the comments on this PR, GH-6122, and the bug tracker. @pitrou agrees with the doc change, but he wasn't sure if the coding example should be changed. I believe Ned was hoping for a second opinion.

@applio
Copy link
Member

applio commented Sep 13, 2019

Per the discussion in issue33082, closing this PR.

@applio applio closed this Sep 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting review docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants