bpo-34430: double chaining futures in asyncio.wrap_future

[alfred-sa]

asyncio.future.wrap_future is used to wrap a concurrent.future.Future in a asyncio.future.Future.

The actual implementation as the following behaviours :

1. When the concurrent.future.Future gets a result, the asyncio.future.Future gets the same result,
2. When the asyncio.future.Future is cancelled, the concurrent.future.Future is cancelled

I wonder why the futures synchronisation is not symmetrical ?
I propose to add the following behaviours :

3. When the asyncio.future.Future gets a result, the concurrent.future.Future gets the same result,
4. When the concurrent.future.Future is cancelled, the asyncio.future.Future is cancelled

If there is good reasons to not implement the proposed behaviours, I would be glad to know.

Thank you !

https://bugs.python.org/issue34430

[the-knights-who-say-ni]

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!