Outdated stub package guidance

[WMOkiishi]

The guidance for distributing stub packages on the "Type Stubs" page (link) still recommends using the types-<package> naming convention. If I've understood recent updates (see #1577) correctly, this is (now?) only preferred for typeshed stub distributions. This section is why I published the stub package I maintain with the types- prefix, so, it should probably be changed if that's not the way things are meant to be done.

[hauntsaninja]

Thanks, opened a PR to fix this.

It's always been the case that types- was meant to indicate typeshed stubs, we've just not done a good job of communicating that / what we really wanted was namespaces on PyPI.