New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add activation functions (ReLU and SiLU for now) for structured sparse linear operator #101339
Conversation
…e linear operator [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/101339
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ 3 Unrelated FailuresAs of commit 4dd1e44: UNSTABLE - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
…e linear operator ghstack-source-id: dbccf81feeae952f008d29b90ff12b3e2fa617ca Pull Request resolved: #101339
…tured sparse linear operator" cc nikitaved pearu cpuhrsch amjames bhosmer [ghstack-poisoned]
…e linear operator ghstack-source-id: 1114550774c7f46e7b204f0137ab7599bfec1526 Pull Request resolved: #101339
Overall the changes look reasonable. Can you check how much this increases our binary size? You can look at the size of libtorch_cuda.so. I'm worried we'll start adding a lot of size. |
It doesn't seem too much of a difference: without my PRs, the size of |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: PR #100881 has not been reviewed yet |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: This PR is too stale; the last push date was more than 3 days ago. Please rebase and try again. You can rebase and merge by leaving the following comment on this PR: Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
@pytorchbot merge -r |
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
…tured sparse linear operator" cc nikitaved pearu cpuhrsch amjames bhosmer [ghstack-poisoned]
Successfully rebased |
…e linear operator ghstack-source-id: bcb0b9672f4fc6b2c75a0fd2e39d6edca1a5db68 Pull Request resolved: #101339
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
@pytorchbot revert -m "Depends on #100881, which has to be reverted due to internal build breakage." -c ghfirst |
@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here. |
@alexsamardzic your PR has been successfully reverted. |
…ed sparse linear operator (#101339)" This reverts commit bfb3941. Reverted #101339 on behalf of https://github.com/izaitsevfb due to Depends on #100881, which has to be reverted due to internal build breakage. ([comment](#101339 (comment)))
…e linear operator (#101339) Pull Request resolved: #101339 Approved by: https://github.com/cpuhrsch
…tured sparse linear operator" cc nikitaved pearu cpuhrsch amjames bhosmer [ghstack-poisoned]
…e linear operator ghstack-source-id: 1f4a2a1b7d7de4c4f25cbecb92ad6ac85309feeb Pull Request resolved: #101339
@izaitsevfb has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
@pytorchbot rebase |
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
Rebase failed due to Command
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/5284684057 |
…tured sparse linear operator" cc nikitaved pearu cpuhrsch amjames bhosmer Differential Revision: [D46453476](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D46453476) [ghstack-poisoned]
…e linear operator ghstack-source-id: cdb106bf3e9fa37467038573e54fb6a4f85ece8b Pull Request resolved: #101339
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
cc @nikitaved @pearu @cpuhrsch @amjames @bhosmer
Differential Revision: D46453476