Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

group constraints by arg #101815

Closed

Conversation

avikchaudhuri
Copy link
Contributor

@avikchaudhuri avikchaudhuri commented May 18, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: D45995199

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @anijain2305 @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @desertfire

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: fx release notes category label May 18, 2023
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 18, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/101815

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit c68ebbe:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2023
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

ghstack-source-id: 189589736
Pull Request resolved: #101815
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189595751

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
@avikchaudhuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failing tests would be fixed by #100739

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189622941

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

cc voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189646062

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

cc voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189662634

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

cc voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189695554

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

cc voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189734399

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

cc voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189742576

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)

cc voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2023
Pull Request resolved: #101815

Before, we would emit a soup of specializations / constraints without any obvious order to guide readability.

With this diff, we group such results by arg, and add comments preceding each group. Empirically, the results read much better.
ghstack-source-id: 189775144

Differential Revision: [D45995199](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D45995199/)
@avikchaudhuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 20, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@DanilBaibak
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot revert -m "Break internal build" -c ghfirst

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Can't revert PR that was landed via phabricator as D45995199. Please revert by going to the internal diff and clicking Unland.

@DanilBaibak
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot revert -m "Break internal build" -c ghfirst

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Can't revert PR that was landed via phabricator as D45995199. Please revert by going to the internal diff and clicking Unland.

malfet added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
This reverts commit 03de158.
Reverted #101815 on behalf of https://github.com/malfet due to it broke ExecuTorch and author was well aware about it"
PaliC added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
This reverts commit 03de158.
Reverted #101815 on behalf of https://github.com/malfet due to it broke ExecuTorch and author was well aware about it"

[ghstack-poisoned]
PaliC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
This reverts commit 03de158.
Reverted #101815 on behalf of https://github.com/malfet due to it broke ExecuTorch and author was well aware about it"

ghstack-source-id: 124ef67dcc8edd2a0eda866e5bb8940b89fc2894
Pull Request resolved: #101985
@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented May 22, 2023

@avikchaudhuri I've reverted this PR in 496212f as it broke ExecuTorch internally, which you were are at the time you merged this PR, haven't you?

@avikchaudhuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

@malfet Retrying because I couldn't repro the failures internally on latest trunk. The failures were supposed to be fixed by another diff in that train.

avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Retrying #101815

Differential Revision: [D46076971](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D46076971/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
avikchaudhuri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
Retrying #101815

Differential Revision: [D46076971](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D46076971/)

cc voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/avikchaudhuri/23/head branch June 8, 2023 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged module: dynamo release notes: fx release notes category topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants