New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix ignored_states when they are passed as generators #102575
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/102575
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit e0dcac8: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
ghstack-source-id: c496dd352b7ffa287313229d44719f800a092cec Pull Request resolved: #102575
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This changes makes sense to me, but I am wondering what was the edge case that motivated this?
Ah, generators. That makes sense.
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
This PR fixed the case where ignored_states are passed as generators, not List/Set Pull Request resolved: pytorch#102575 Approved by: https://github.com/awgu
This PR fixed the case where ignored_states are passed as generators, not List/Set Pull Request resolved: pytorch#102575 Approved by: https://github.com/awgu
This PR fixed the case where ignored_states are passed as generators, not List/Set Pull Request resolved: pytorch#102575 Approved by: https://github.com/awgu
This PR fixed the case where ignored_states are passed as generators, not List/Set
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):