Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix 'Node' object is not iterable in functorch.compile.minifier #103011

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix 'Node' object is not iterable in functorch.compile.minifier #103011

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

makslevental
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #102169

cc @mgehre-amd

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 5, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/103011

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 936af42 with merge base 388ba7e (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: fx release notes category label Jun 5, 2023
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 5, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: makslevental / name: Maksim Levental (936af42)

@janeyx99 janeyx99 requested a review from zou3519 June 6, 2023 14:31
@janeyx99 janeyx99 added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label Jun 6, 2023
@makslevental
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zou3519 test fails look like flakes to me.

@zou3519 zou3519 requested review from Chillee and removed request for zou3519 June 13, 2023 13:33
@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

zou3519 commented Jun 13, 2023

Deferring to @Chillee

@github-actions
Copy link

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 12, 2023
@mgehre-amd
Copy link

Ping, this fix is important for us. Can someone re-run the tests, please?

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

zou3519 commented Aug 15, 2023

@pytorchbot rebase

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Successfully rebased fix_minifier onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict, please pull locally before adding more changes (for example, via git checkout fix_minifier && git pull --rebase)

@makslevental
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping @zou3519

@kit1980
Copy link
Member

kit1980 commented Sep 12, 2023

Is this ready to be merged?

@makslevental
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this ready to be merged?

approved and all tests pass (1 skip) so i think so?

@kit1980
Copy link
Member

kit1980 commented Sep 12, 2023

@makslevental FYI when a PR is approved by a project member, anyone can post a "@pytorchbot merge" comment to merge the PR.

@makslevental
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Sep 12, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / linux-focal-rocm5.6-py3.8 / test (default, 1, 3, linux.rocm.gpu)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@makslevental
Copy link
Contributor Author

makslevental commented Sep 12, 2023

@kit1980 I believe this failed test is a flake. Can you please land on your side.

@Chillee
Copy link
Contributor

Chillee commented Sep 12, 2023

Can anybody use pytorchbot merge -f too? haha

@Chillee
Copy link
Contributor

Chillee commented Sep 12, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "flaky tests"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source release notes: fx release notes category Stale triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

'Node' object is not iterable in functorch.compile.minifier
8 participants